Fw: f-prot antivirus useless buffer overflow
From: Knud Erik Højgaard (kain@ircop.dk)
Date: 02/06/03
- Previous message: A***: "Re[2]: Windows reverse Shell"
- Next in thread: Jonas the Netwanderer: "Re: Fw: f-prot antivirus useless buffer overflow"
- Maybe reply: Jonas the Netwanderer: "Re: Fw: f-prot antivirus useless buffer overflow"
- Reply: Jonas the Netwanderer: "Re: Fw: f-prot antivirus useless buffer overflow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Knud Erik Højgaard <kain@ircop.dk> To: <vuln-dev@securityfocus.com> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:51:00 +0100
bugtraq-owner@securityfocus.com wrote:
>>>>>> -------------------- >>>>>
> Send this to vuln-dev and note the possibility of exploitation through
> configurations such as backup scripts, etc.
> <<<<< -------------------- <<<<<
Silly backupscripts using arguments to the f-prot binary in a silly way
may be vulnerable.
-- Knud Erik Højgaard
attached mail follows:
- message/rfc822 attachment: f-prot_antivirus_useless_buffer_overflow.eml
- Next message: NetNinja: "Windows reverse Shell #2"
- Previous message: A***: "Re[2]: Windows reverse Shell"
- Next in thread: Jonas the Netwanderer: "Re: Fw: f-prot antivirus useless buffer overflow"
- Maybe reply: Jonas the Netwanderer: "Re: Fw: f-prot antivirus useless buffer overflow"
- Reply: Jonas the Netwanderer: "Re: Fw: f-prot antivirus useless buffer overflow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]