Re: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks
From: Emeric Miszti (emeric@uksecurityonline.com)Date: 08/30/02
- Previous message: Jason Coombs: "SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks"
- In reply to: Jason Coombs: "SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks"
- Next in thread: Peter Gutmann: "RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Emeric Miszti <emeric@uksecurityonline.com> To: <jasonc@science.org>, <vuln-dev@security-focus.com> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:19:36 +0100
On Thursday 29 Aug 2002 10:51 pm, Jason Coombs wrote:
> SUMMARY: There does not appear to be any way to get Windows 2000 to stop
> binding to port 445 at this time. It's possible in Windows NT, but then
> again SMB was an after-thought for NT (Service Pack 3 or 4, I don't
> remember which) and the NT kernel doesn't bind port 445 as aggressively.
Have a look at http://www.uksecurityonline.com/husdg/windows2000/close445.htm
and try the methods there. Works for me and everyone else who has done this.
Hope this helps.
Regards
-- Emeric Miszti UK Security Online http://www.uksecurityonline.comTel No: 0870 088 5689 Fax No: 0870 706 2162
- Previous message: Jason Coombs: "SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks"
- In reply to: Jason Coombs: "SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks"
- Next in thread: Peter Gutmann: "RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
