Re: Google lists vulnerable sites.

From: Ron DuFresne (dufresne@winternet.com)
Date: 07/07/02 

Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 06:33:09 -0500 (CDT)
From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne@winternet.com>
To: Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka <mfrd@attitudex.com>

On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka wrote:

> GOOGLE is an administration tool? hmm... anyway, you're right about the fact that yes it's not google's responsibility, admins could have a better robots.txt in their webfolders too.

Not all web-robots are well trained enough to pay attention to robots.txt
files though...

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
        ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Google lists vulnerable sites.
    ... Google might as well ignore robots.txt. ... Octavio. ... >GOOGLE is an administration tool? ... hmm... ...
    (Vuln-Dev)
  • Re: Wheel bearing wont budge
    ... >> Wicked Uncle Nigel wrote: ... >> Hmm. ... I didn't even have to Google. ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles.classic)
  • Re: Big Web.Config
    ... Hmm, cool. ... Google finds: ... a blog post by K. Scott Allen. ... "One caveat to this approach is that the ASP.NET runtime does not detect when the external file changes. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: moving N number of files from one dir to another
    ... >> Hmm that's the second time I've seen you comment on the ... >> something then google is a good tool, ... The reason you had a minus score in my score table was because ...
    (comp.unix.shell)
  • Re: Livin da vida Youksef
    ... >> funniest punchline of 2006. ... > Hmm... ... What does Google know? ... rob at rjp dot clara dot net ...
    (uk.sport.football)
Loading