Re: OpenSSh 3.4p1 PrivilegeSerparation experiment
From: Philipp Buehler (lists@fips.de)Date: 06/29/02
- Previous message: Edsel Adap: "Re: Possible flaw in XFree?"
- In reply to: HAYDEN AARON N.: "OpenSSh 3.4p1 PrivilegeSerparation experiment"
- Next in thread: Aaron.Hayden@Colorado.EDU: "Re: OpenSSh 3.4p1 PrivilegeSerparation experiment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:55:42 +0200 From: Philipp Buehler <lists@fips.de> To: "HAYDEN AARON N." <Aaron.Hayden@Colorado.EDU>
On 29/06/2002, HAYDEN AARON N. <Aaron.Hayden@Colorado.EDU> wrote To vuln-dev@securityfocus.com:
> o you expect disconnection from an ssh'd tty when root sends sshd the
> signal to hangup.
Wrong.
> A bug?:
> No, I do not think so.
> But is this the behavior you would expect?
Yes, the spinoffs are not LISTENing (as you stated), so what's the
point in rereading a config being used for LISTEN sshds?
See the same behaviour in Apache privilege seperation about
graceful restarts. The spinoff httpds do not care for the
new configuration aswell.
Altogether I don't see where this is a vuln-dev?
ciao
-- Philipp Buehler, aka fips | sysfive.com GmbH | BOfH | NUCH | <double-p>#1: Break the clue barrier! #2: Already had buzzword confuseritis ?
- Previous message: Edsel Adap: "Re: Possible flaw in XFree?"
- In reply to: HAYDEN AARON N.: "OpenSSh 3.4p1 PrivilegeSerparation experiment"
- Next in thread: Aaron.Hayden@Colorado.EDU: "Re: OpenSSh 3.4p1 PrivilegeSerparation experiment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|