RE: spying (deleted) file entries in other users' directories
From: Maximiliano Pérez (mp@overflow.com.ar)Date: 06/28/02
- Previous message: mdonnelly: "Re: Possible flaw in XFree?"
- In reply to: D.C. van Moolenbroek: "Re: spying (deleted) file entries in other users' directories"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Maximiliano Pérez <mp@overflow.com.ar> To: "D.C. van Moolenbroek" <xanadu@chello.nl>, "FozZy" <fozzy@dmpfrance.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 13:46:39 -0300
AIX 4.3.3, HPUX 11.00 and 10.20 , work this way.
Cheers.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: D.C. van Moolenbroek [mailto:xanadu@chello.nl]
Enviado el: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:47 AM
Para: FozZy
CC: vuln-dev@securityfocus.com
Asunto: Re: spying (deleted) file entries in other users' directories
Hi there,
> I saw this for the first time 3 years ago on a SunOS system while doing
"cat /root" as a user. I don't know if current Sun systems are patched or
not.
Solaris 8 is vulnerable at least, the scenario you attached works on Solaris
8 exactly the same way...don't know about Solaris 9. On a sidenote, IRIX is
not vulnerable.
$ uname -svr
SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-14
Note that on my system, reading doesn't work on /tmp ("input error: Invalid
argument"); it seems to work on all other directories though. Generally I
suppose it's a bad idea to put something sensitive in a filename, but what
do the other bytes represent, that show up in the hexdump?
-David
--
class sig{static void main(String[]s){for// D.C. van Moolenbroek
(int _=0;19>_;System.out.print((char)(52^// (CS student, VU, NL)
"Y`KbddaZ}`P#KJ#caBG".charAt(_++)-9)));}}// -Java sigs look bad-
- Previous message: mdonnelly: "Re: Possible flaw in XFree?"
- In reply to: D.C. van Moolenbroek: "Re: spying (deleted) file entries in other users' directories"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]