RE: Xbox (Was -Online Games Consoles and Security Implications)
From: Deus, Attonbitus (Thor@HammerofGod.com)Date: 06/04/02
- Previous message: dong-h0un U: "PFinger Buffer Overflow Vulnerability."
- In reply to: Ken Pfeil: "RE: Xbox (Was -Online Games Consoles and Security Implications)"
- Next in thread: Robert Freeman: "RE: Xbox (Was -Online Games Consoles and Security Implications)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 09:38:23 -0700 To: <Ken@InfoSec101.org>, <vuln-dev@securityfocus.com>, <John_Leitch@NAI.com> From: "Deus, Attonbitus" <Thor@HammerofGod.com>
At 05:54 AM 6/4/2002, Ken Pfeil wrote:
>I know the XBox thread was killed recently, but this is good reading.
>
>http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/06/01/1656228&mode=thread&tid=172
>
>http://web.mit.edu/bunnie/www/proj/anatak/AIM-2002-008.pdf
>
>June 3, 2002
>
>MIT Grad Student Hacks Into Xbox Security System
Isn't the XBox OS protected by the new DRM patent? Meaning that any
security vulnerabilities could be used to enable copyright infringement;
the publication of which would be illegal under the DMCA?
It will be interesting to how MS responds to this.
AD
- Previous message: dong-h0un U: "PFinger Buffer Overflow Vulnerability."
- In reply to: Ken Pfeil: "RE: Xbox (Was -Online Games Consoles and Security Implications)"
- Next in thread: Robert Freeman: "RE: Xbox (Was -Online Games Consoles and Security Implications)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
