RE: PDF modifications?

From: Dawes, Rogan (ZA - Johannesburg) (rdawes@deloitte.co.za)
Date: 05/17/02


From: "Dawes, Rogan (ZA - Johannesburg)" <rdawes@deloitte.co.za>
To: "'Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu'" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>, "Dawes, Rogan (ZA - Johannesburg)" <rdawes@deloitte.co.za>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:02:50 +0200

My mistake. See http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/cracking.html

But, nonetheless, it is simple to make the mods, I'm sure.

Rogan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]
> Sent: 17 May 2002 02:51
> To: Dawes, Rogan (ZA - Johannesburg)
> Cc: 'Sumit Dhar'; Kurt Seifried; bad bob; vuln-dev
> Subject: Re: PDF modifications?
>
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2002 08:14:18 +0200, "Dawes, Rogan (ZA -
> Johannesburg)" said:
>
> > If the PDF is openable and viewable, but is "protected", so
> that you can't
> > select or print or annotate, that is easily bypassed with almost any
> > non-Adobe PDF viewer, such as xpdf, which simply elects not
> to honour that
> > setting in the PDF. The data is all there, because you can
> view it, it is
> > simply a case of the software choosing to not let you
> select it. Find some
> > software that doesn't honour those document settings, and
> you are on your
> > way.
> >
> > As I recall, there was some discussion about this issue on
> the xpdf lists,
> > or somewhere, about whether xpdf should honour the document
> requests or not,
> > but it is really moot, since the source is there, just
> modify it to suit. I
> > think that was the conclusion by the xpdf developers, so
> they simply didn't
> > bother honouring the setting.
>
> This must have been pre-DMCA. I would recommend that the xpdf
> developers not visit the US, lest they be Skylarov'ed.
>
> (The vuln-dev connection? Consider why Alan Cox censored a
> Linux kernel
> changelog - but further discussion should probably be moved
> to a political
> list. If you're in the US and of voting age, contact your
> Congresscreature
> and tell them you want them to support Rep. Rick Boucher (D-VA) in his
> attempts to fix the anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA).
>
> We now return you to your regularly scheduled vuln-dev
> discussion, which
> may be in violation of the anti-circumvention clause....
> --
> Valdis Kletnieks
> Computer Systems Senior Engineer
> Virginia Tech
>
>
>



Relevant Pages

  • RE: PDF modifications?
    ... it simple removes any protection of the pdf file. ... Find some software that doesn't honour those document ... there was some discussion about this issue on the xpdf ... For your protection, this e-mail message has been scanned for viruses. ...
    (Vuln-Dev)
  • RE: PDF modifications?
    ... PDF files produced with Acrobat 5 and secured against being opened without a password can not be opened in this fashion. ... Find some software that doesn't honour those document ... there was some discussion about this issue on the xpdf ...
    (Vuln-Dev)
  • Re: PDF modifications?
    ... > software that doesn't honour those document settings, ... > As I recall, there was some discussion about this issue on the xpdf lists, ... attempts to fix the anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA). ...
    (Vuln-Dev)
  • RE: PDF modifications?
    ... There are a couple of issues with PDF "protection". ... software that doesn't honour those document settings, ... As I recall, there was some discussion about this issue on the xpdf lists, ...
    (Vuln-Dev)
  • ANNOUNCE: Xpdf 3.00 - a PDF viewer for X
    ... Glyph & Cog, LLC is pleased to announce a new version of Xpdf, the ... project also includes a PDF text extractor, ...
    (comp.os.linux.x)

Quantcast