Re: Publishing Nimda Logs
From: unprivileged user (jsbloom@adelphia.net)Date: 05/08/02
- Previous message: Bernie Cosell: "Re: Publishing Nimda Logs"
- In reply to: zeno: "Re: Publishing Nimda Logs"
- Next in thread: Paul_Asadoorian: "RE: Publishing Nimda Logs"
- Next in thread: Matt Andreko: "RE: Publishing Nimda Logs"
- Reply: Paul_Asadoorian: "RE: Publishing Nimda Logs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: unprivileged user <jsbloom@adelphia.net> To: zeno <bugtraq@cgisecurity.net> Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 18:20:12 -0400
On Tuesday 07 May 2002 17:06, zeno wrote:
> Here is an idea.
>
> Perhaps make windows do updates every 5 minutes in default install. Problem
> solved.
>
>
> - zeno@cgisecurity.com
Aacckkk! No! Windows XP Pro has the automatic update service enabled by
default and that is a BAD idea. I want to know what patches are going to be
installed before they reach my production servers. For one thing I don't
want to install things that don't apply to my system. For another patches
are not always tested sufficiently (NT4 SP2 anyone?)
I would prefer that Microsoft leave this function out of the default install
and opt for "inform me when a patch is available" mode instead. They can
even make it red and flashy and say "critical" but don't install it for me.
- Previous message: Bernie Cosell: "Re: Publishing Nimda Logs"
- In reply to: zeno: "Re: Publishing Nimda Logs"
- Next in thread: Paul_Asadoorian: "RE: Publishing Nimda Logs"
- Next in thread: Matt Andreko: "RE: Publishing Nimda Logs"
- Reply: Paul_Asadoorian: "RE: Publishing Nimda Logs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|