Re: Behavior analysis vs. Integrity analysis [was: Binary Bruteforcing]
From: auto12012 auto12012 (auto12012@hotmail.com)Date: 03/29/02
- Previous message: vkp: "Re: Behavior analysis vs. Integrity analysis [was: Binary Bruteforcing]"
- Maybe in reply to: auto12012 auto12012: "Re: Behavior analysis vs. Integrity analysis [was: Binary Bruteforcing]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "auto12012 auto12012" <auto12012@hotmail.com> To: syz@dds.nl, vuln-dev@securityfocus.com Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:18:50 +0000
>
>When (manually) auditting code I'm thinking all the time about
>all possible execution paths, what if A happends, then B combined with C...
>Even automated programs exists which do this (www.splint.org).
>So I don't know why you say it has nothing to do with vulnerabilities...
>
If you count on your fingers, does that mean numbers have something to do
with your anatomy? Auditing code by going through all the execution paths is
exactly the same. You're counting on your fingers.
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
- Previous message: vkp: "Re: Behavior analysis vs. Integrity analysis [was: Binary Bruteforcing]"
- Maybe in reply to: auto12012 auto12012: "Re: Behavior analysis vs. Integrity analysis [was: Binary Bruteforcing]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]