Re: slocate bug.
From: Rodrigo Barbosa (rodrigob@tisbrasil.com.br)Date: 02/21/02
- Previous message: Larry Jones: "Re: [Fwd: Help needed with bufferoverflow in cvs]"
- Maybe in reply to: Ehud Tenenbaum: "slocate bug."
- Next in thread: Jay Beale: "Re: slocate bug."
- Reply: Jay Beale: "Re: slocate bug."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:38:22 -0300 From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@tisbrasil.com.br> To: vuln-dev@securityfocus.com
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:54:39AM +0000, Wodahs Latigid wrote:
> > Again, on Conectiva Linux snapshot:
> >
> > frodo [/home/rodrigob] > slocate abc -oMoP
> > fatal error: slocate: Must specify an 'Update' database option first.
> > frodo [/home/rodrigob] > ls -lap MoP
> > ls: MoP: No such file or directory
> Just out of curiosity, if you give it the
> required option (the 'Update' database
> option), plus the -o option, does it
> still not create the file?
Yes, the file is created. But as far as I undertood the docs, this is
the expected behaviour.
And reading about the tests of the other list subscribers, looks like
there is no system with any file writable by group slocate.
Now, the question remains: is it possible to compromisse anything with
it ? At first glance, I'm tempted to say "no".
Anyone cares to make a definitive statement ?
[]s
-- Rodrigo Barbosa - rodrigob at tisbrasil.com.br TIS - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" - http://www.tisbrasil.com.br/ Brainbench Certified -> Transcript ID #3332104
- Previous message: Larry Jones: "Re: [Fwd: Help needed with bufferoverflow in cvs]"
- Maybe in reply to: Ehud Tenenbaum: "slocate bug."
- Next in thread: Jay Beale: "Re: slocate bug."
- Reply: Jay Beale: "Re: slocate bug."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|