Re: Malicious use of grc.com
From: Chris (chrisb@bcnstech.net)Date: 11/28/01
- Previous message: Marcus Blankenship: "RE: Synaptics TouchPad, strange packets."
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jay D. Dyson: "Re: Malicious use of grc.com"
- Next in thread: netscience@hushmail.com: "Re: Malicious use of grc.com"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <20011127235857.29653.qmail@securityfocus.com> From: Chris <chrisb@bcnstech.net> To: H C <keydet89@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:59:39 +1100 Subject: Re: Malicious use of grc.com
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:09:59 -0800, H C wrote:
>> Not necessarily. There are a vast number of
>> misconfigured proxies
>> available on the 'net that would afford a malicious
>> outsider ample
>> opportunity to do their dirty work without betraying
>> their point of
>> origin. This negates the immediacy of any audit
>> trail and exacerbates the
>> severity of Gibson's oversight.
>
>For a port scan? Really?
Hi,
Find just about any out of the box proxy setup and you will be able
to check things like http://host:1/ http://host:1234/ etc
I think squid is about the only one that blocks this misuse by
default? Could be wrong about that one though.. More could restrict
ports by default these days..
Regards
-- Chris, chrisb@bcnstech.net on 28/11/2001
- Previous message: Marcus Blankenship: "RE: Synaptics TouchPad, strange packets."
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jay D. Dyson: "Re: Malicious use of grc.com"
- Next in thread: netscience@hushmail.com: "Re: Malicious use of grc.com"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading