Re: PGP sign highlight on mutt
From: Andreas Hasenack (andreas@conectiva.com.br)Date: 10/27/01
- Previous message: Javier Abdul Córdoba Gándara: "RE: data stream bug still alive?"
- In reply to: Rodrigo Barbosa: "Re: PGP sign highlight on mutt"
- Next in thread: Zen: "Re: PGP sign highlight on mutt"
- Reply: Zen: "Re: PGP sign highlight on mutt"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 19:32:44 -0200 From: Andreas Hasenack <andreas@conectiva.com.br> To: vuln-dev@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: PGP sign highlight on mutt Message-ID: <20011027193244.B1933@conectiva.com.br>
Em Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:54:46PM -0200, Rodrigo Barbosa escreveu:
> I don't know about you (or your mutt config), but mine shows a little "s"
> on the status line on the bottom of the message, which I always check to
> see if the message is really signed. Also, I get an 's' on the index.
That might not be enough for many users. Compare a little "s" with 4 or 5
lines of text saying that the email is signed. It's like a big OK stamp.
It's rather disturbing that there is no way of telling what is in the body of
the message and what was generated by, say, gpg. Only a little "s" (and
perhaps the status line saying that the signature checked out ok or not,
but for some reason mine always says it didn't worked).
- Previous message: Javier Abdul Córdoba Gándara: "RE: data stream bug still alive?"
- In reply to: Rodrigo Barbosa: "Re: PGP sign highlight on mutt"
- Next in thread: Zen: "Re: PGP sign highlight on mutt"
- Reply: Zen: "Re: PGP sign highlight on mutt"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|