static dll's for windows buffer overflows
From: Franklin DeMatto (franklin.lists@qDefense.com)Date: 09/24/01
- Previous message: Robert Collins: "RE: Citrix Client Access Verification"
- Next in thread: dullien@gmx.de: "Re: static dll's for windows buffer overflows"
- Reply: dullien@gmx.de: "Re: static dll's for windows buffer overflows"
- Reply: Enrique A. Compań Gzz.: "Re: static dll's for windows buffer overflows"
- Reply: Ryan Permeh: "Re: static dll's for windows buffer overflows"
- Reply: foob@return0.net: "Re: static dll's for windows buffer overflows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010924003120.00aaa9d8@compumodel.com> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:35:55 -0400 To: vuln-dev@securityfocus.com From: Franklin DeMatto <franklin.lists@qDefense.com> Subject: static dll's for windows buffer overflows
Windows buffer overflows almost always require knowledge of offsets in
dll's. Even if rva is used, usually one offset is still known, to jmp to
where the code is (e.g., let's say the shellcode is pointed to by eax, we
need to know the offset of somewhere to jmp eax). Which dll's are the most
static? For the jmp instruction, we can use any dll, as long as it has
those bytes (i.e., we are not limited to kernel, user, and gdi). Which
dll's are the best to use, and why?
(BTW, I would like to suggest that the term "buffer overflow" be replaced
with the term "memory overwrite," as there are many forms besides buffer
overflow, such as format string, malloc (0) mangling, etc. )
Franklin DeMatto
Senior Analyst, qDefense Penetration Testing
http://qDefense.com
qDefense: Making Security Accessible
- Previous message: Robert Collins: "RE: Citrix Client Access Verification"
- Next in thread: dullien@gmx.de: "Re: static dll's for windows buffer overflows"
- Reply: dullien@gmx.de: "Re: static dll's for windows buffer overflows"
- Reply: Enrique A. Compań Gzz.: "Re: static dll's for windows buffer overflows"
- Reply: Ryan Permeh: "Re: static dll's for windows buffer overflows"
- Reply: foob@return0.net: "Re: static dll's for windows buffer overflows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|