Re: New "concept" virus/worm?
From: Brett Glass (brett@lariat.org)Date: 09/18/01
- Previous message: John Thornton: "RE: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jay D. Dyson: "Re: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Next in thread: Ryan Russell: "Re: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Next in thread: Guillaume TARRARE: "RE: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Next in thread: Dave Salovesh: "RE: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Reply: Ryan Russell: "Re: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Reply: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010918105427.046e7330@localhost> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:57:36 -0600 To: "Jay D. Dyson" <jdyson@treachery.net>, Incidents List <incidents@securityfocus.com> From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Subject: Re: New "concept" virus/worm?
At 10:21 AM 9/18/2001, Jay D. Dyson wrote:
> It's a two-prong worm. It appears to be primarily disseminated
>via e-mail, and then launches its attacks on web hosts upon successful
>infection.
Newsbytes is calling this worm "Code Rainbow," while some of the antivirus
firms seem to be calling it "W32.Nimda.A@mm".
Can the e-mail infect anything other than Windows NT/2000? Will it infect
a system that's running Windows NT/2000 but not IIS? If a Windows 95/98/ME
user opens it, will his or her system begin to spread the worm as well?
--Brett Glass
- Previous message: John Thornton: "RE: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jay D. Dyson: "Re: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Next in thread: Ryan Russell: "Re: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Next in thread: Guillaume TARRARE: "RE: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Next in thread: Dave Salovesh: "RE: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Reply: Ryan Russell: "Re: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Reply: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: New "concept" virus/worm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|