Re: Sun Sep 9 01:46:40 2001 GMTFrom: Joseph Mallett (jmallett@NewGold.NET)
- Previous message: Kayne Ian (Softlab): "Outlook makes 99% CPU Usage with this message"
- In reply to: Rķkharšur Egilsson: "Sun Sep 9 01:46:40 2001 GMT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:55:41 +0000 From: Joseph Mallett <jmallett@NewGold.NET> To: Rķkharšur Egilsson <Rikhardur.EGILSSON@oecd.org> Subject: Re: Sun Sep 9 01:46:40 2001 GMT Message-ID: <20010829165541.A44861@NewGold.NET>
It will affect people who use braindead sorting algorithms in things like
perl to sort dates in unix time() format.
I guarantee it will be a bigger problem than Y2K, but that is not saying
much at all.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:03:30AM +0200, Rķkharšur Egilsson wrote:
> Has anybody done any research in what production systems (web, mail-
> servers, OSes etc) might have a problem at :
> perl -e 'print localtime(1000000000) . "\n";'
> The only thing I have found, so far, is this (old) version of KMail :
> The whole issue, and the absense of any discussion, looks like either,
> (1) A disaster just waiting to happen or
> (2) A non-problem.
> Personally my wote is for (2).
> For vulnerable systems, there might be a problem if the system accepts
> dates from users and a user enters a date after September 9th 2001.
> (buffer overflow ?)
> Rķkharšur Egilsson - Networking/Security EXD/ITN/CCO
> OECD/OCDE - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
-- -- Joseph A. Mallett http://srcsys.org
xMach Core Team, www.xMach.org