Re: Java Enterprise Safe ??
- From: Adriel Desautels <adriel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:41:35 -0400
Java has better security when it doesn't contain vulnerabilities. The
code isn't always the problem, sometimes the interpreter is the problem.
In most cases though, it is the developer as suggested before. Java can
be very safe.
Regards,
Adriel T. Desautels
Chief Technology Officer
Netragard, LLC.
Office : 617-934-0269
Mobile : 617-633-3821
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/118/a45
Join the Netragard, LLC. Linked In Group:
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/48683/0B98E1705142
------------------------------------------------
Netragard, LLC - "The Specialist in Anti-Hacking"
Netragard Whitepaper Downloads:
-------------------------------
Choosing the right provider : http://tinyurl.com/2ahk3j
Three Things you must know : http://tinyurl.com/26pjsn
Gleb Paharenko wrote:
Hi!
IMHO, java projects have better security. Variable binding and no
dynamic sql significantly improves sqli strength.
2008/10/7 Mattias Hemmmingsson <mattias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
God morning
We are now working with java enterprise at the glassfish server.
And a come of thinking how secure is java really ?
If you look att OWASP home page you can find the ten most common
security risk against java,
So with XSS how mutch damiage can you do to the system ore can you
only change the clients view ?
Sql injection is it poosible to do with java enterprise ?
And the big one JAS ( java auth system or somthing like that) How safe
is it realy ?
// matte
- References:
- DOT NET code review
- From: Mork
- Re: DOT NET code review
- From: J. Oquendo
- File traces
- From: Sumeet Narula
- RE: File traces
- From: John Grubb
- RE: File traces
- From: Tiago 'gouki' Faria
- Java Enterprise Safe ??
- From: Mattias Hemmmingsson
- Re: Java Enterprise Safe ??
- From: Gleb Paharenko
- DOT NET code review
- Prev by Date: Re: Wiping a drive: /dev/zero or /dev/urandom better?
- Next by Date: RE: Flash Drive Policy
- Previous by thread: Re: Java Enterprise Safe ??
- Next by thread: Re: File traces
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|