Re: CEH Course - Your thoughts?
- From: Robert Hudock <rhudock@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:58:47 -0400
J5,
The test is really easy, you likely do not need a course. Get the
review guide and practice questions (print-ables versions from a vendor
whose address is found on the EU Council website). I would recommend
taking a course taught by instructors taught at BlackHat. In
particular, I would recommend the combat hacking class by SensePost and
Chris Eagle's Reverse Engineering course.
You do not need the course to qualify to take the test -- if you can
meet some basic requirements.
Regards, Robert
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 16:54 -0400, J5 wrote:
I will be rounding up my first year as a security analyst soon and my--
company has offered to send me to a CEH course taught by Dan Garfield
and it is held by IT Training Solutions. This is the new v6 course.
I feel very comfortable with locating vulnerabilities on the network
and exploitation methodologies. I do penetration testing on my job,
but it is a very small part of my daily activities. I see many tools
listed in the description that I just haven't had the time to go hands
on with.... and some I use extensively.
I would like to ask anyone who has attended one of these 5 day courses
to reply with their experiences. I am looking for a lab based
environment to experiment with tools I haven't had the opportunity to
use. I am already ingrained with CIA, AAA & management aspects of
infosec as well as the 'anatomy of an attack.' I want to get to the
nitty gritty and not have the same vague overview I get all the time.
I really want to spend a solid week focusing on improving my toolkit.
Do you feel like this course would be beneficial to me or should I
hold off for something else. (SANS, Foundstone, etc)
Robert J. Hudock, Esq., CISSP
Associate, Epstein Becker and Green, PC.
Washington, DC Office
1227 25th Street, NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20037-1156
Phone: 202/861-1893
Fax: 202/861-3513
rhudock@xxxxxxxxxx
rhudock@xxxxxxxxx
www.ediscovery.us.com (e-discovery blog)
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)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=KCTq
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- CEH Course - Your thoughts?
- From: J5
- CEH Course - Your thoughts?
- Prev by Date: Attack distribution statistics
- Next by Date: Re: attack ssh with medusa
- Previous by thread: Re: CEH Course - Your thoughts?
- Next by thread: Re: CEH Course - Your thoughts?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|