all-in-one vs one-on-each (feat. Comercial vs FOSS)
- From: Alex <alex.tsr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 16:02:41 +0300
Hello list,
I would like some opinions, again.
For a fixed budget would you go for
* an all-in-one "Firewall" ( FW+IPS+VPN+...) ie. Checkpoint,
* a dedicated, known and expensive firewall/gateway with the company of
an Open Source solution for IPS, URL filtering etc?
* a full Open Source solution (iptables,snort,ossec,squid etc) and
spend the money elsewhere :)
The things that concern me are,
Redundancy. I can live without IPS for a while but not without Internet
( and by "I" I mean "The Company")
Scalability. Not only performance-wise but cost-wise too. I think that
having to pay for every "extra feature" is going to lead to Open Source
anyway...
Complexity. Better to manage one than more, right?...
Any opinion appreciated!
Cheers, Alex.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: all-in-one vs one-on-each (feat. Comercial vs FOSS)
- From: John Jasen
- Re: all-in-one vs one-on-each (feat. Comercial vs FOSS)
- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
- Re: all-in-one vs one-on-each (feat. Comercial vs FOSS)
- Prev by Date: RE: DSS (Passing an audit is NOT compliance!)
- Next by Date: Re: How to manage passwords of lots of server?
- Previous by thread: Serveral host broadcasting to port 1434
- Next by thread: Re: all-in-one vs one-on-each (feat. Comercial vs FOSS)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|