RE: Advice regarding servers and Wiping Drives after testing

Bill,

Go to http://www.DaveKleiman.com/Files all of my labs are available there.


How interesting you state "" and supposedly recovered a file in the lab (the
recovery process was not shown),".

To have a better perspective on all of this information, you may want to
read:

Can Intelligence Agencies Read Overwritten Data: http://tinyurl.com/8zblp

Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory:
http://tinyurl.com/iqx3 (pay special attention to the "Epilogue")

Secure File Deletion: Fact or Fiction?: http://tinyurl.com/yuqoqj


Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: William Holmberg [mailto:wholmberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:19
To: dave kleiman; security-basics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Advice regarding servers and Wiping Drives after testing

Dave,
<Note- the links from your page on Infragard "Zip | PPT | Handout PDF
|
CD Active Links PDF" Do not work, although Mr. Bejtlich's links do-
I'd
like to get your data for future classes>

I looked up my notes on that day, to verify my memories of the
presentation, and to answer your question...

Well, yes and no...
The first example, the instructor clearly stated that the drive had
been
overwritten 0's, and supposedly recovered a file in the lab (the
recovery process was not shown), in this case a .jpg which was
partially
(3/4's)viewable. He remarked the technique would remain undisclosed,
but
that it was time intensive and expensive, yet still used regularly. He
did not say it wasn't ESM either, so perhaps that is what it was. I
paraphrase him by the quote "Even when the drive has been overwritten
with 1's and Zeroes we can often get evidence with this new
procedure".
Frankly, I remember him saying it having something to do with magnetic
signatures, differentiation and time (age) of magnetic signatures, if
that makes sense.

The second example the drive was formatted and partitions deleted, and
data was recovered successfully on that example, but there was a third
demonstration where some files that were overwritten with another type
of file, and it was presented to us (understand, we were viewing the
process remotely, and there was no way for me personally to verify
exactly what was really occurring on the other end, but we had no
reason
to doubt the veracity of the claims) that the overwritten files were
recovered immediately after the overwrite. I do remember that I had
questions about that particular procedure because in that case the
computer had not been restarted, but was still running. I had thought
perhaps some NVRAM or swap file was involved in the recovery, but time
did not permit us to ask all the questions I and the attendees had for
the team presenting. The examiners referred to the users method as a
virtual "flashpaper" technique where a small directory was overwritten
with other innocuous files by the suspect through a software package
which responded to a Hotkey.

We were also given the impression that the third recovery technique
was
quite new, perhaps even experimental, and that the types of files
recovered were limited by both their type as well as the types of
files
replacing/overwriting the existing files. I was told it had something
to
do with the way the files were altered which allowed restructuring of
what had changed, but there were no technical specifics given.

I'm sorry I don't have more on it. If we are successful in getting
more
funding for the DOJ classes I will press the issue in the next
semester
with others involved to see if I can get some more specific info on
those aspects.

Specifically though, you are correct that in the formatted example,
the
drive had not been "shredded" and completely overwritten with a
program
intended to subvert any recovery, although the examiner did allude to
it
being "extremely more difficult" once that was done, though the
implication was that it was not impossible. He also did show how to
tell
that certain programs had been used (on another drive) to totally
remove
potential evidence, which was also interesting, and sounds like it is
similar to what your class accomplished in San Diego.

So, specifically, Ansgar is likely quite correct that in a case where
the drive has been shredded by overwriting in that manner that no data
can be recovered easily- but we were given the impression that it had
just been done, though it was possible that was a limited ESM method.

I do not claim personal expertise in this area, as I mentioned, but I
do
believe that most people in the class came away with the impression
that
it could be done, but there was mention of a cost to benefit ratio,
and
even admissibility of the evidence. For instance, if the drive was
purchased as a refurbished drive from any vendor, it is likely the
agencies would rarely try to ESM for evidence because no matter how
successful they may be, a shrewd lawyer could quite easily get a jury
to
have reasonable doubts about where the data recovered actually came
from.

I will ask our director to reschedule this presentation again and be
sure to ask some more pertinent questions next time to see where
exactly
the parameters of the presentation begin and end. If there are other
definitive articles, etc. you all know of, please let me know as I
would
love to expand on this topic in the classes. Perhaps we could even
setup
a remote presentation with some of you- though I warn you the class
pays
poorly!
:0)
All the best,
Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: dave kleiman [mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 9:08 AM
To: security-basics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Advice regarding servers and Wiping Drives after testing

Bill,

I think you are mistaken. I attend and teach labs at most of the
forensic
events yearlong including the FBI InfraGard National Conference (
http://tinyurl.com/24vuj8 ). As a matter of fact, last month at the
HTCIA
International conference in San Diego, part of my class demonstrated
how
to
identify the traces of different types of erasure programs. These were
single random and/or zero passes.
You can download it here: http://tinyurl.com/35mbc9 . I have NEVER
seen or
heard of a demonstration or tool, outside of an ESM Electron Scanning
Microscope, that would recover the data after being "wiped".
Perhaps you are thinking of after deleting partitions and/or
formatting
several passes??

Dave



Respectfully,

Dave Kleiman - http://www.davekleiman.com
4371 Northlake Blvd
Suite 314
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
561.310.8801







-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of William Holmberg
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 17:36
To: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers;
security-basics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Advice regarding servers and Wiping Drives after
testing



-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 1:03 PM
To: security-basics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Advice regarding servers and Wiping Drives after
testing

On 2007-09-01 gjgowey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> A since pass with all zero's really won't protect your data
from
being
> recovered by more advanced data recovery software let alone
alone
> hardware.

I'd like to see a single case where someone was able to recover
data
from an overwritten harddisk, even after a single pass with
zeroes.

*********************
Hi,
No doubt you are an intelligent and well educated person in
these
fields, and probably have many areas of expertise more
proficient
than
mine. I do have to state however, and nearly any Infragard
member
can
tell you, the FBI uses tools that accomplish this on a regular
basis.
I
have no doubt other agencies do as well. We have had
demonstrations of
it remotely in a class I help instruct, SAFE computing for Law
Enforcement and Non-Profits (SAFE is Security And Forensic
Education)
at
Metro State University of Minnesota, MCTC campus.

My .02...
-Bil

Relevant Pages

  • RE: Advice regarding servers and Wiping Drives after testing
    ... recovery process was not shown), in this case a .jpg which was partially ... with 1's and Zeroes we can often get evidence with this new procedure". ... recovered immediately after the overwrite. ... Advice regarding servers and Wiping Drives after testing ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • RE: Advice regarding servers and Wiping Drives after testing
    ... Using a factor of the drives magnetic density that relates to a +1 ... nullify that overwrite, leaving the last write before that one plainly ... one of the speakers Red and Black connectors. ... Writing all 0's will never prevent against software recovery ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • RE: Peter Gutmann data deletion theaory?
    ... A simple format is nothing like a low level format or a 3* overwrite. ... about data being recovered from decommissioned drives you can do like we ... If you have ever done any form of data recovery, ...
    (Bugtraq)
  • Re: Ruined m-board with bios update
    ... Doubt that you will be back to this post to see this, but if you are, I received an an identical replacement motherboard from Intel today and just finished installing it. ... Plugged all the hard drives into the same connections as the old board and after all the other tiny little connections I turned it on. ... to re-set the clock in the bios and that was no problem. ... Turned power on & inserted recovery CD. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter)
  • Re: Unclassified Disk "Sanitizers"
    ... you will OVERWRITE it with data from the first sector to the ... wish to pursue other PHYSICAL RECOVERY methods such as the use of Scanning ... >> Read each physical sector of the drive and explain to me how meaningful ... >>> into account various encoding methods used my makers of the drives. ...
    (Security-Basics)