Re: terminal server security vs vpn

From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:54:37 +0200

On 2007-08-14 Brent Kern wrote:

We went through this at our government agency and the remote desktop
client is 128bit encrypted.

Without knowing the encryption algorithm that doesn't mean anything. At
all.

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches
becoming available."
--Jason Coombs on Bugtraq

References:
- terminal server security vs vpn
  - From: Juan B
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn
  - From: Chris Barber
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn
  - From: Brent Kern

Prev by Date: Re: terminal server security vs vpn
Next by Date: Fwd: password list generation
Previous by thread: RE: terminal server security vs vpn
Next by thread: RE: terminal server security vs vpn
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: portscanner
... Ansgar Wiechers ... "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches ...
(Security-Basics)
Re: Script
... Ansgar Wiechers ... "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches ...
(Security-Basics)
Re: whats the meaning of threats from unknown peoples in yahoo services? what they looking for?
... Ansgar Wiechers ... "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches ...
(Security-Basics)
Re: Basic question about remote registry on Windows
... It should be 'microsoft-ds' (NetBios, ... Ansgar Wiechers ... "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches ...
(Security-Basics)