Re: terminal server security vs vpn
- From: "Chris Barber" <cmbarber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:18:29 -0700
Juan,
If you use SSL-VPN you will not need a client, or at worst you will
not be required to install a client before you can make the
connection. The only thing needed from that standpoint is a browser.
This makes VPN more "Web Like" and easier on the user, without
compromising your security. i would contact one of the loacl
resellers in your area and ask for a demo
Cisco, Juniper, Aventail and Checkpoint all have SSL-VPN solutions
that are quite nice. I prefer the Juniper myself.
Hope this helps
Chris.
On 8/13/07, Juan B <juanbabi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a solution to my users so they can
log in from home and work connect to there office
pc's, of course I will use terminlal server.
My question is, why to use double encryption, why use
vpn client to connect to the corporate FW and then to
connect throw it with a ts session, AFAIK Ts is
encrypted as well and one can set the encryption to
high which is the same as VPN right?
I want to nake the connection simple to the user and
securure. do I need also a vpn client, I guess not, am
I missing something here?
I will also change the port to increase security.
Thanks a lot,
Juan
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yahoo.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn
- From: Chandresh Dedhia
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn
- From: Brent Kern
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn
- References:
- terminal server security vs vpn
- From: Juan B
- terminal server security vs vpn
- Prev by Date: Re: Gear
- Next by Date: RE: terminal server security vs vpn
- Previous by thread: terminal server security vs vpn
- Next by thread: RE: terminal server security vs vpn
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|