Re: Why TCP is more secure than UDP?
- From: Javier Reyna Padilla <jreyna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:49:29 -0500
You can read the RFC for this, but I think that the point is not
security,. TCP is conection based and UDP is conectionless
When you initiate a TCP transfer after every packet that is sent ans
acknowledge one is needed from the receiver, with UDP this is nos
necessary, that is the difference between this protocols.
paavan.shah@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
It is said that UDP is considered more vulnerable to spoofing than TCP?
Can anyone point me to any document/link which describes TCP is more secure than UDP
- Follow-Ups:
- Shifting to Single Domain, things to worry about!
- From: WALI
- RE: Why TCP is more secure than UDP?
- From: Largacha Lamela, Daniel
- Shifting to Single Domain, things to worry about!
- References:
- Why TCP is more secure than UDP?
- From: paavan . shah
- Why TCP is more secure than UDP?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why TCP is more secure than UDP?
- Next by Date: Re: Open Source Router with NAT
- Previous by thread: Re[2]: Why TCP is more secure than UDP?
- Next by thread: RE: Why TCP is more secure than UDP?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|