Re: This mailing list on a blog
- From: David Nalley <davidn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:55:37 -0400
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 08:39:55 am Tara Kelly wrote:
Regardless, I think that password protecting the archives would at least
put a mini (ok, *very* mini) obstacle between the mailinglist and
automatic scraping/posting. But it would be better than nothing.
What makes you think they aren't subscribed to the list and scraping that way,
or that they couldn't work around it. I suppose my question is, whats the
point of password protecting the archives if you aren't also going to
password protect the list itself.
Moreover, it's all posted on Nabble as well, which gets indexed by Google,
which has a far higher percentage of non-security-minded individuals.
http://www.nabble.com/Security-Basics-f404.html
David Nalley
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: This mailing list on a blog
- From: David Harley
- RE: This mailing list on a blog
- References:
- This mailing list on a blog
- From: tarak
- RE: This mailing list on a blog
- From: David Harley
- Re: This mailing list on a blog
- From: Tara Kelly
- This mailing list on a blog
- Prev by Date: Re: Firewall Testing
- Next by Date: Re: SV: Re: Firewall load balacing switches
- Previous by thread: RE: This mailing list on a blog
- Next by thread: RE: This mailing list on a blog
- Index(es):