RE: firewall cluster
- From: "Murda Mcloud" <murdamcloud@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:11:51 +1000
I'd balance the security of variety against the issues of misconfiguring
something because of the difference. Do you have one person who know each
system really well or someone who knows both?
-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of sandra
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:18 PM
To: security-basics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: firewall cluster
Hello,
We want to set up a cluster of two firewalls with heartbeat. It will be an
active-passive
cluster, so if main firewall fails, secondary firewall would become active.
We think that, although they are a cluster, they should have different
Operating Systems
(for example linux and BSD), so if a vulnerability has impact in our main
firewall and
drops it, the second firewall will start to serve without the same
vulnerability affecting it.
Do you think is a good idea or is better to have two identical firewalls for
compatibility
issues?
Which combination of Operating Systems do you recommend?
Thanks,
Sandra
- References:
- firewall cluster
- From: sandra
- firewall cluster
- Prev by Date: Re: firewall cluster
- Next by Date: RE: how to block web messenger services
- Previous by thread: Re: firewall cluster
- Next by thread: Carrying out an application security assessment for a Visual Basic application
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|