Re: RE: Laptop security
- From: aaarugrat@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 22 Feb 2007 22:20:06 -0000
The only problem with this, is that if you require a user to replace an expensive asset. You will lose not only the asset (as it's difficult to force payment), but likely the employee as well. In almost all cases, the value of possible sensitive data, and the value of the employee outweighs the value of the hardware by a huge amount. If this is not the case, then the asset should never have been issued in the first place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: BigFix
If your IT fails, you're out of business - or worse. Arm your
enterprise with BigFix, the single converged IT security and operations
engine. BigFix enables continuous discovery, assessment, remediation,
and enforcement for complex and distributed IT environments in real-time
from a single console.
Think what's next. Think BigFix.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;82309979;15562032;o?http://www.bigfix.com/ITNext/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Prev by Date: Re: Lotus Notes Encryption
- Next by Date: Re: Security Simplification
- Previous by thread: Re: Laptop security
- Next by thread: Re: RE: Laptop security
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|