Re: VLANs confusing
- From: "Brian Loe" <knobdy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:02:59 -0600
On 11/12/06, Raj Shaz <rajshas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All i understand of VLANs is encryption of packets at source and
decryption at destination.
VLANs do NOT do encryption.
Which protocol does these machines should used then?
There are two protocols for VLANs, one is proprietary to Cisco.
When two cisco devices are configured for VLANs , we basically make
these devices to transfer key (for en/decryption) ,does these keys has
any relevance with other VLANs?. Is there exists a possibility of key
overlapping on gigantic network ( akin internet ).
There isn't a key involved as there isn't any encryption involved.
Might you be confusing VLANs for VPNs?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Norwich University
EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE
The NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence in Information Security. Our program offers unparalleled Infosec management education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree, without disrupting your career or home life.
http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- VLANs confusing
- From: Raj Shaz
- VLANs confusing
- Prev by Date: RE: Problem Disabling "Null Session" on W2K3
- Next by Date: Re: full-disk-encryption for linux ?
- Previous by thread: RE: Filer/Share Time Access Restrictions (Help).
- Next by thread: Re: VLANs confusing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
