Re: RE: Wireless Security (Part 2)
- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:36:47 +0200
On 2006-05-23 Lloydm wrote:
All of these issues are FINALLY no longer issues with the soon to be
"officially" release system from www.kmdo.com. 100% security,
guaranteed!
What a big load of bull***.
Not only you have to entrust your entire communication to one company,
this company also uses propietary technology so you can never be sure
*how* secure this really is. Why does this use proprietary, "bleeding-
edge" technology instead of established, well-tested and known secure
technology? When it comes to security, bleeding-edge is *always* a bad
idea, because it cannot be tested well enough (otherwise it wouldn't be
bleeding-edge).
In addition to that the system accepts mail only from previously
approved addresses, meaning that you will practically devoid yourself of
Internet mail (how is a potential customer going to contact you?), which
is - as I might add - something that can be easily set up by oneself
with a whitelisting spam filter.
I really don't need this kind of spam on the list.
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"If you think technology can solve your security problems, then you
don't understand the problems and you don't understand the technology."
--Bruce Schneier
- References:
- RE: RE: Wireless Security (Part 2)
- From: Ebeling, Jr., Herman Frederick
- RE: RE: Wireless Security (Part 2)
- From: Lloydm
- RE: RE: Wireless Security (Part 2)
- Prev by Date: RE: MS Audit logs
- Next by Date: RE: AD Policy audit tool for Windows 2000
- Previous by thread: RE: RE: Wireless Security (Part 2)
- Next by thread: RE: RE: Wireless Security (Part 2)
- Index(es):