Re: Syncing iptables rules between two servers

Our Adaptive Firewall technology has had this feature for years for
organizations with multiple sites and it works quite well.

Best regards,

Bob Toxen, CTO
Horizon Network Security
"Your expert in Firewalls, Virus and Spam Filters, VPNs, Linux System
Administration, local and remote backup software, Network Monitoring,
and Network Security consulting"

http://www.verysecurelinux.com [Network & Linux/Unix Security Consulting]
http://www.realworldlinuxsecurity.com [My 5* book: "Real World Linux Security"]
http://www.verysecurelinux.com/sunset.html [Sunset Computer]
bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (e-mail)
+1 770-662-8321 (Office: 10am-6pm M-F US Eastern Time)

Author,
"Real World Linux Security: Intrusion Detection, Prevention, and Recovery"
2nd Ed., Prentice Hall, (C) 2003, 848 pages, ISBN: 0130464562
Also available in Japanese, Chinese, Czech, and Polish.

If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked.
What's more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- White House cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke

-----Original Message-----
From: Lars Solberg [mailto:sunberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 6:26 PM
To: focus-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; security-basics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Syncing iptables rules between two servers

Hi

Is there anyone that know about how I can "sync" iptables rules on two
different servers? The plan is to have (on one of the servers) a
script that automaticly block ip adresses with iptables depending on
different conditions. When that ip adress is blocked I want it to
automaticly be blocked on another server to.

One idea is to change the script that is adding the block rule to
iptables to make it soo it can send the rule to the other server, but
this is not an option, the iptables rules must be synced after the
iptables rule have been added.
Another idea is to get the iptables to use an sql database of some
sort to load the rules, but I dont know how, and this whould be
somehow ruining the whole thing of having a firewall if you make it
dependent an sql server (i think).. But afterall, if this is possible
this is option.

Any ideas?
Hope someone can help out..

Thanks
Lars

----- End forwarded message -----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Webroot

Don't leave your confidential company and customer records un-protected.
Try Webroot's Spy Sweeper Enterprise(TM) for 30 days for FREE with no
obligation. See why so many companies trust Spy Sweeper Enterprise to
eradicate spyware from their networks.
FREE 30-Day Trial of Spy Sweeper Enterprise

http://www.webroot.com/forms/enterprise_lead.php
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Relevant Pages

  • RE: Secure Network Design (DMZ, LAN, etc)
    ... you'll see that their both on the same subnet. ... It has a port for the trusted network and a port ... Our firewall handles NAT. ... > servers, wouldn't it require a public IP and therefore be somewhat ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • RE: [fw-wiz] Security Audit and Priorities
    ... Learn your network. ... - Linux Security Cookbook ... Building Secure Servers with Linux ... It's one thing to be a firewall admin and write ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)
  • Re: terminal services quirkyness question
    ... When you ssh into your Firewall you are Basically inside your Network ... will have to change the default port that TS listens too... ... Open the Ports in your Firewall and Point them to your servers, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: [fw-wiz] Isolating internal servers behind firewalls
    ... We have a cisco firewall services module that we us for our head ... So, for a given network, you can move ... There are general purpose file servers, AD domain controllers, SMS ... The firewall/security group argues that servers and clients should exist ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)
  • Re: Dcidag errors
    ... Port blockage between servers ... Other sorts of networking issues (lack of connectivity between the points ... These errors are typically a result of a network connectivity issue of some ... > replicating this nc. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)