RE: Blocking Instant Messaging Applications
From: Aditya Deshmukh (aditya.deshmukh_at_online.gateway.strangled.net)
Date: 11/24/05
- Previous message: michael young: "Re: password cracking: one char at a time."
- In reply to: Murad Talukdar: "RE: Blocking Instant Messaging Applications"
- Next in thread: Gaddis, Jeremy L.: "Re: Blocking Instant Messaging Applications"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'Murad Talukdar'" <talukdar_m@subway.com>, "'Nick Duda'" <nduda@VistaPrint.com>, "'Gaddis, Jeremy L.'" <jeremy@linuxwiz.net>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:11:32 +0530
> Hi Nick--do you use the hash of the binary because there's a
> way round it if you just used the .exe name?
> So clever users can rename the file and be back
> online?
Also the hash mechanism would also be very easily defeated with
Reshacker or even with echo. >> exefilename.exe
This would keep the file working and alter the hash of the file
________________________________________________________________________
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
- Previous message: michael young: "Re: password cracking: one char at a time."
- In reply to: Murad Talukdar: "RE: Blocking Instant Messaging Applications"
- Next in thread: Gaddis, Jeremy L.: "Re: Blocking Instant Messaging Applications"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|