Re: Remote Control to a remote computer with no listen port

From: mickael kael (mickael.kael_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/22/05

  • Next message: John R. Dennison: "Re: secure disposal of backup tapes"
    Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 21:08:53 +0100
    To: John Maher <john.e.maher@gmail.com>
    
    

    Hello,

    I was not talking about port knocking, but my question was not very
    clear, i'm sorry.

    Here is the architecture

    PC to remote control -- NAT/FW--Internet -- NAT/FW --Me
    (info : NAT with no BIMAP and no port redirect)

    Yes i see finaly that UltraVNC permit to install a relayer, or a NAT2NAT system.

    But i decide to make VPN with openvpn.

    PC to remote control with openvpn(MS or Linux) -- NAT/FW-- OpenVPN
    Server on a Virtual Private Server -- NAT/FW -- Me with OpenVPN or
    ssltunnel

    And on the endpoint just simply use RDP or Ultra VNC on my virtual network

    Thanks a lot for all your answers,

    Best regards,

    Mk,

    On 11/21/05, John Maher <john.e.maher@gmail.com> wrote:
    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    > Hash: SHA1
    >
    > If I understand you correctly, then you might want to consider port
    > knocking. A Google search for "port knocking" will provide you with
    > plenty of information.
    >
    > John
    >
    > mickael kael wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > I'm searching a tool of remote control wich support no listen port on
    > > the remote computer. That mean that the remote computer must open
    > > connection to a server which permit connection to him.
    > >
    > > client to control ---(VPN over https)---> server (java applet)
    > > <---(https)-- client
    > >
    > > Any idea or documentation to implement that ?
    > >
    > > Best regards,
    > >
    > > Mk
    > >
    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
    > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
    >
    > iD8DBQFDgh59uY7WcSII22oRAu1bAJ94SYlMe3oVsKtYonnxWIF3OGHBgQCgw2oB
    > 85sseqh/XGIrXnvC+9iCpcM=
    > =3FHG
    > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    >


  • Next message: John R. Dennison: "Re: secure disposal of backup tapes"