RE: integrity and mail encryption
From: Andrew Chong (andrewjw_at_singnet.com.sg)
Date: 11/04/05
- Previous message: Steven Jones: "RE: Why NOT to disable Real Time Antivirus on Servers"
- In reply to: Pranav Lal: "RE: integrity and mail encryption"
- Reply: Robert Hines: "RE: integrity and mail encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'Pranav Lal'" <pranav.lal@gmail.com>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:09:04 +0800
To cut short the topics of asymmetric key and public key encryption, the
common practice is to have a Certificate Authority (CA) which is a
trusted third-party for Key Management and also for non-repudiation.
One example is the common SSL certificates which are distributed by CA
Verisign, baltimore, entrust etc.
These CA are there to entrust the authenticity of the keys and digital
certificates (look into X.508).
This PKI book is worth to keep.
Rethinking Public Key Infrastructure and Digital Certificates: Building
in Privacy.
http://www.sweetfantasy.biz/prod_details.aspx?AsinSearch=0262024918&type
=heavy&f=xml
Regards,
Andrew Chong, cissp
-----Original Message-----
From: Pranav Lal [mailto:pranav.lal@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 5:21 AM
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: integrity and mail encryption
Hi Bob,
How does public key encryption provide non-repudiation
Pranav
- Previous message: Steven Jones: "RE: Why NOT to disable Real Time Antivirus on Servers"
- In reply to: Pranav Lal: "RE: integrity and mail encryption"
- Reply: Robert Hines: "RE: integrity and mail encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|