RE: VAN
From: Benjamin Fogel (benjaminfogel_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 10/22/05
- Previous message: Alloishus BeauMains: "Re: remote desktop question"
- In reply to: jalbuquerque_at_northkingtsown.org: "VAN"
- Next in thread: Brian Loe: "RE: VAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <security-basics@securityfocus.com> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:17:20 +0200
Really sticking my neck out here, as I don't really know much about this
field.
It sounds a lot like OpenVPN to me. Would it not be simpler/cheaper to just
set up OpenVPN with everybody connecting to a single, centralised location?
-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:jalbuquerque@northkingtsown.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 19:45
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: VAN
I have an ISP pitching a Virtual Area Network to take the place Point to
Point connections I have
The pitch is
Virtual Area Network (VAN) brings the next generation of virtual private
networking to you. VAN provides a networking solution that enables you to
connect remote offices and/or workers to the main office. In simplest terms,
the VAN provides reliable, secure data transmissions across a physical
network link.
-Protocol independent
-TCP/IP,NetBEUI,IPX and AppleTalk tested
Security:
-Baseline privacy,anti-spoofing functions,private addresses
This is the proposed configuration
VAN SITES|---| ISP ATM|---|STC|--|ISP ATM|---|WAN
I will be setting up a meeting to find out more, but would like to have some
input from you all.
Anyone have experience with this?
Any security related info would be helpful.
Thanks
Jason
___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
- Previous message: Alloishus BeauMains: "Re: remote desktop question"
- In reply to: jalbuquerque_at_northkingtsown.org: "VAN"
- Next in thread: Brian Loe: "RE: VAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]