Re: OS to know.
From: Jonathan Pauli (jpauli_at_istreamimaging.com)
Date: 10/18/05
- Previous message: Robert Reed: "Re: Hard drives v. CF/Smart media/etc."
- In reply to: Raoul Armfield: "Re: OS to know."
- Next in thread: Kelly Martin: "Re: OS to know."
- Reply: Kelly Martin: "Re: OS to know."
- Reply: Kevin white: "Re: OS to know."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:11:42 -0500 To: Raoul Armfield <armfield@amnh.org>
This is some serious Troll Bait put out by curtis I think.
I'm hoping most of the infrastructure Curtis mentioned isn't on the
public Internet. I know a grad student who trained at a Navy base in
Florida for a summer in info security. She says they use custom hacked
Unix variants- never a stock kernel. They use windows boxes for desktop
apps a lot- but what did you expect? In this day I suspect we are
terrorists automagically for merely being on a mailing list in which
someone thinks about mentioning enumerating and focusing on operating
systems .mil uses- so who wants to think about trying to verify this?
Raoul Armfield wrote:
> Steven Kalcevich wrote:
>
>> I can see Cyberguard Firewall Appliance an issue for telling anyone
>> the rest is standard, i mean they arent running windows 3.11 for
>> workgroups :) or custom OS Marine XP for workstations for general
>> work. be glad he didnt say DOS :)
>>
>
> but then again, now a hacker knows that they can focus on RH Ent,
> Solaris or BSD, They can also concentrate vulnerabilities in the
> routers because they have the specific IOS release they are running so
> they. remember the first step is enumeration and Curtis made that
> all the easier. Also this post is not only in the mailboxes of the
> subscribers but freely available on the net in the archives.
>
> Raoul
>
>> Regards
>>
>> Steve Kalcevich
>>
>> xyberpix wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Curtis,
>>>
>>> You're joking right?????
>>> Are you allowed to give all that info out?
>>>
>>> xyberpix
>>>
>>> On 13 Oct 2005, at 00:57, Curtis LaMasters wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm a Systems Administrator in the Marine Coprs so I can give you
>>>> insigt on the military section of the government. We are currently
>>>> running Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Windows XP, Windows 2000 as our
>>>> typical server and desktop operating systems. You will see some
>>>> instances of Red Hat Enterprise, Solaris, and BSD. Our current
>>>> firewall choice is the Cyberguard Firewall Appliance. As for routers
>>>> and switches we are 100 percent Cisco IOS. The current standardized
>>>> os is 12.3x. Hope that helps.
>>>>
>>>> Curtis
>>>>
>>>> On 10/11/05, John Williams <ibmros@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am a graduate student at George Mason University obtaining my MS in
>>>>> Information Security and Assurance. What operating system is used
>>>>> more for
>>>>> security administration in the private sector versus the
>>>>> government sector?
>>>>> Pretty much I would like to know what operating system I should
>>>>> focus on if
>>>>> I wanted to pursue a government career in security or if I wanted
>>>>> to purse a
>>>>> career in the private sector. Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark Jacobs
>>>>>
>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice
>>>>> on how to
>>>>> get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Curtis LaMasters
>>>>
>>>> "Life is hard, but It's harder when your stupid"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
- Previous message: Robert Reed: "Re: Hard drives v. CF/Smart media/etc."
- In reply to: Raoul Armfield: "Re: OS to know."
- Next in thread: Kelly Martin: "Re: OS to know."
- Reply: Kelly Martin: "Re: OS to know."
- Reply: Kevin white: "Re: OS to know."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]