Re: Vulnerability Assessment Process
From: mike king (ngiles_at_hushmail.com)
Date: 09/09/05
- Previous message: Rohit: "possible bug in .xml serialization might skip messages"
- Maybe in reply to: John Madden: "Vulnerability Assessment Process"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 07:17:37 -0700 To: <security-basics@securityfocus.com>, <chiwawa999@yahoo.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Should have all you need.
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 08:43:47 -0700 John Madden
<chiwawa999@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is there a standard for the number of consecutive
>vulnerability assessment a firm can perform ?
>
>I think that two consecutive assessments is enough but
>i would like some backing....
>
>Any links or documentation you might have would be
>appreciated.
>
>Thank you
>
>
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
>http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify
Version: Hush 2.4
wkYEARECAAYFAkMhmX4ACgkQUjm7xSZSd8FrGQCfXlcfUlk41iHRTQ8ph+sheezsNqwA
oIQD8E7UCzQxQA63S9cYJCyTa5Dm
=6c8j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: Rohit: "possible bug in .xml serialization might skip messages"
- Maybe in reply to: John Madden: "Vulnerability Assessment Process"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]