Re: RBLs for SPAM Control
From: Devdas Bhagat (devdas_at_dvb.homelinux.org)
Date: 08/05/05
- Previous message: security_at_surefoot.com: "Re: Remote Management using Dial-up/Broadband"
- In reply to: Alexis: "Re: RBLs for SPAM Control"
- Next in thread: David Gillett: "RE: RBLs for SPAM Control"
- Maybe reply: Phil Cryer: "Re: Re: RBLs for SPAM Control"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 22:09:05 +0530 To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
On 05/08/05 01:48 +1000, Alexis wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 02:12 pm, you wrote:
> > As a rule of thumb, most RBLS automatically list dynamic IPs used for dial
> > ups / modem pools of ISPs as suspicious. Simply because any mail from a
> > dynamic IP is considered unsafe, in RBL terms !
>
> Interesting . . . . i wonder how many false-positives this creates? i would
> think it would be quite a few, given the number of people who send emails
> from dynamic IPs . . . .
>
In terms of spam blocked? Almost none. If you are on a dynamic IP, use
your ISPs outbound SMTP server to relay your mail.
Devdas Bhagat
- Previous message: security_at_surefoot.com: "Re: Remote Management using Dial-up/Broadband"
- In reply to: Alexis: "Re: RBLs for SPAM Control"
- Next in thread: David Gillett: "RE: RBLs for SPAM Control"
- Maybe reply: Phil Cryer: "Re: Re: RBLs for SPAM Control"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]