Re: SSL VPN
From: Bill Moran (wmoran_at_potentialtech.com)
Date: 07/20/05
- Previous message: 123_at_mail.com: "Re: IPX over IPSec VPNs or SSL VPNs"
- In reply to: ec_at_ec.com: "Re: RE: SSL VPN"
- Next in thread: jason.franks_at_nucorsteelsc.com: "Re: RE: SSL VPN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:56:57 -0400 To: ec@ec.com
ec@ec.com wrote:
> You get what you pay for...I would not implement a free ssl vpn.
>
> Take a look at companies like Check Point. They have the most secure and
> flexible SSL VPN solutions avail.
There is absolutely no evidence to demonstrate that SSL VPN solutions that
must be paid for are any better than free ones.
There is considerable evidence to support the theory that open-source
development results in significantly less buggy software than closed
source development. In most cases, the SSL algorithms used by the VPN
solutions are the same for both closed and open-sourced software. Thus,
the main security concern is whether the software implementing those
algorithms is bug-free or not.
Thus, evidence supports the theory that an open-source VPN solution is
more likely to be secure than a closed-source one.
-- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
- Previous message: 123_at_mail.com: "Re: IPX over IPSec VPNs or SSL VPNs"
- In reply to: ec_at_ec.com: "Re: RE: SSL VPN"
- Next in thread: jason.franks_at_nucorsteelsc.com: "Re: RE: SSL VPN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]