Re: Prividing Intranet Website Access To External Users

• Previous message: Barrie Dempster: "Re: Basic Windows Security Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Date: 31 Mar 2005 03:01:05 -0000
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com

Ideally, I really wouldnt like to be having my company intranet on the
dmz, or allowing access from the internet to a natted address of an
internal server

I would probably integrate the ldap/dc as a security server on the
firewall and have the remote users authenticate against the ldap/dc
when they hit the firewall and then pass them through to the intranet
server. You will probably somehow need to let the intranet server know
that the user has been authenticated by the dc when they connected
through the firewall, so that the user doesn't have to authenticate a
second time when they hit the web server. I agree, its slightly less
transparent than directly browsing to the webserver, but would
probably be more secure

I think the ssl vpn.. could also be an option,

If you've got checkpoint, you could buy the connectra ssl network
extender product which will do the this kind of job very well, or you
could look at the firepass ssl vpn solution.

Regards
Ben Smethurst

>Received: (qmail 14471 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2005 07:30:
03 -0000
>Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com (HELO
outgoing2.securityfocus.com) (205.206.231.26)
> by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2005 07:30:03 -0000
>Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com
[205.206.231.19])
> by outgoing2.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with QMQP
> id BED9214644B; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:31:54 -0700 (MST)
>Mailing-List: contact security-basics-help@securityfocus.com; run by
ezmlm
>Precedence: bulk
>List-Id: <security-basics.list-id.securityfocus.com>
>List-Post: <mailto:security-basics@securityfocus.com>
>List-Help: <mailto:security-basics-help@securityfocus.com>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:security-basics-
unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
>List-Subscribe: <mailto:security-basics-
subscribe@securityfocus.com>
>Delivered-To: mailing list security-basics@securityfocus.com
>Delivered-To: moderator for security-basics@securityfocus.com
>Received: (qmail 8323 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2005 08:33:36
-0000
>content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
>Subject: RE: Prividing Intranet Website Access To External Users
>Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:22:40 -0000
>Message-ID:
<25E5794BFEA11E4AAA83359BC2D0E28003F5A402@LDNPSMEU002V
EUA.INTRANET.BARCAPINT.COM>
>X-MS-Has-Attach:
>X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
>Thread-Topic: Prividing Intranet Website Access To External Users
>Thread-Index: AcUPQczM6h6Z+S26RsWekiEdCkdDSgAB9loQ
>From: <Steve.Cummings@barclayscapital.com>
>To: <gabriel_orozco@mx.sumida.com>, <rustychiles@gmail.com>,
> <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Feb 2005 08:22:40.0839 (UTC)
> FILETIME=[AFEB4D70:01C50F49]
>
>Stronghold from redhat would be a good fit
>
>Regards
>
>Steve Cummings=20
>Web Services
>Barclays Capital
>>*Direct: +44 (0) 207 773 4245
>>* E-Mail: steve.cummings@barclayscapital.com
>>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gabriel Orozco [mailto:gabriel_orozco@mx.sumida.com]=20
>Sent: 07 February 2005 19:10
>To: rusty chiles; security-basics@securityfocus.com
>Subject: Re: Prividing Intranet Website Access To External Users
>
>
>I would install a reverse proxy, like apache, just connect to the
>internal web server and the firewall filter every other traffic.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "rusty chiles" <rustychiles@gmail.com>
>To: <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
>Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 6:16 PM
>Subject: Prividing Intranet Website Access To External Users
>
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I'm asking for reccomendations with the following Scenario:
>>
>> We have a internal intranet site. Users are authenticated using
their=20
>> nt credentials.
>>
>> We need to provide the site externally, translate the internal
links=20
>> to external links, and still pass their NT credentials to the website.
>>
>> MGMT wants to do this without vpn, or any other 3rd party
software on
>
>> the clients computer.
>>
>> The goal here is a single user sign on, so that the end user is=20
>> presented with the same experience at home as they are at work.
>>
>> We WILL use SSL to protect the transportation of the userid and=20
>> password.
>>
>> The web server is IIS on windows2003.
>>
>> The web server will be in the DMZ, and only port 443 will be
allowed=20
>> from the outside world.
>>
>> The problem is that webserver in the dmz will need to have the
ability
>
>> to talk to the domain controller, as well as a sql server.
>>
>> I prefer my resources be separated, and never have internal
servers=20
>> traverse the dmz, but in this case that is not possible due to a=20
>> dependency on the website having tight integration with Active=20
>> directory resources.
>>
>> We could put a sql box in the dmz, but a domain controller.......
I=20
>> don't feel comfortable doing that. One box in the dmz is
compromised,=20
>> then the DC is open to direct attack.
>>
>> If the box talks from the dmz to the internal Domain controller,
we=20
>> can acl the traffic so that it only talks over limited port numbers;
=20
>> however there is still some risk involved. (which we may have to
>> accept)
>>
>> What experience have members of this list had with publishing
their=20
>> intranets to the internet in a secure manner.
>>
>> What has worked reliably, and still provided solid security.
>>
>> I've considered a SSL VPN type portal, ISA Server, and the like
as=20
>> well as several forwarding proxies, but am not 100% comfortable
with=20
>> any of the solutions I have seen thus far.
>>
>> Any reccomendations List members can make will be helpful to us.
>>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
--------------
>For more information about Barclays Capital, please
>visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.
>
>
>Internet communications are not secure and therefore the
Barclays=20
>Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this=20
>message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus
programmes,=20
>it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that
is=20
>caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented
are=20
>solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
the=20
>Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the
Barclays=20
>Group for operational or business reasons.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
--------------
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earn your MS in Information Security ONLINE
Organizations worldwide are in need of highly qualified information security
professionals. Norwich University is fulfilling this demand with its MS in
Information Security offered online. Recognized by the NSA as an
academically excellent program, NU offers you the opportunity to earn your
degree without disrupting your home or work life.

http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus_en
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Previous message: Barrie Dempster: "Re: Basic Windows Security Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]