Re: GIAC Dilution
From: Daniel Miessler (daniel_at_dmiessler.com)
Date: 03/26/05
- Previous message: shankarnarayan.d_at_netsol.co.in: "Security on CDMA for Banking Applications"
- In reply to: Aman Raheja: "Re: GIAC Dilution"
- Next in thread: Michael Bartha: "Re: GIAC Dilution"
- Reply: Michael Bartha: "Re: GIAC Dilution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 05:01:45 -0500 To: Aman Raheja <araheja@techquotes.com>
On Mar 24, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Aman Raheja wrote:
> GIAC will probably becaome equivalent to the Security+.
Not a chance, guy. Despite the dropping of the practical (which I'm not
a fan of), the technical tests (plural) for the GSEC were still *very*
difficult compared to CISSP, Security+, MCSE, or any other test I have
taken. The stuff was quite technical and those without a strong
background will not do well on the tests as they exist today.
> I am not sure how they match up on content or level of knowledge
> required.
It's fairly stout stuff. Think CISSP, but technical.
I think SANS will keep a decent degree of respect in the certification
arena, just not as much as when they had the practical requirement.
That's my hope anyway...
-- Daniel Miessler, CISSP, GSEC Email: daniel@dmiessler.com Web: http://dmiessler.com GPG Key ID: 316BC712
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
- Previous message: shankarnarayan.d_at_netsol.co.in: "Security on CDMA for Banking Applications"
- In reply to: Aman Raheja: "Re: GIAC Dilution"
- Next in thread: Michael Bartha: "Re: GIAC Dilution"
- Reply: Michael Bartha: "Re: GIAC Dilution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|