Re: RPC over HTTP security
From: Barrie Dempster (barrie_at_reboot-robot.net)
Date: 02/03/05
- Previous message: david kuhlman: "Re: Nmap, Firewall Testing, Idlescan?"
- In reply to: Steve: "Re: RPC over HTTP security"
- Next in thread: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers: "Re: RPC over HTTP security"
- Reply: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers: "Re: RPC over HTTP security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 15:16:38 +0000
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 22:46 -0500, Steve wrote:
> We ran OWA with SSL, didn't mean our server didn't get owned by a hacker.
> Consider running a reverse proxy 'nix based box in front of your OWA box
> which runs on IIS.
>
> STEVE
And then what?
Reverse NAT passing through a NIX box offers absolutely no security at
all unless the NIX box has an IPS/IDS or something of that ilk setup on
it which you could easily have on the firewall that is between the OWA
box and the net.
Having a NIX box in place doesn't offer any security above having a
firewall unless the NIX box actually has something running on it.
-- With Regards.. Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue blog: http://zeedo.blogspot.com site: http://www.bsrf.org.uk [ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x96025FD0 ]
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: david kuhlman: "Re: Nmap, Firewall Testing, Idlescan?"
- In reply to: Steve: "Re: RPC over HTTP security"
- Next in thread: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers: "Re: RPC over HTTP security"
- Reply: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers: "Re: RPC over HTTP security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|