Re: Betr.: Re: encryption
From: Philip Wagenaar (p.wagenaar_at_accon.nl)
Date: 01/31/05
- Previous message: miguel.dilaj_at_pharma.novartis.com: "Re:encryption algs"
- Maybe in reply to: Philip Wagenaar: "Betr.: Re: encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:15:48 +0100 To: <Bastian.Schwittay@rwth-aachen.de>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
Exactly!
And why is key length limited so much in PGP? For the speed? If I have a message that is very confidential, I don't mind waiting a few minutes before it's encrypted.
Met vriendelijke groet,
(Philip) Wagenaar
Assistent ICT Projecten & Advies
AccoN Accountants & Adviseurs
ICT Projecten & Advies
Postbus 5090
6802 EB Arnhem
The Netherlands
tel. +31 (0)26-3842384
fax. +31 (0)26-3630222
mobile: +31 (0)6-25388935
MSN/E-mail: p.wagenaar@accon.nl
http://www.accon.nl
>>> Bastian Schwittay <Bastian.Schwittay@rwth-aachen.de> 29-01-05 04:52 >>>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Why isn't my cellphone encrypted? Anyone who steels it and read my
> messages, agenda and view my pictures.
> Why isn't aren't my msn messenger conversations encrypted?
>
> Is it just because we don't want it? Or is it because companies and
> goverments rather see plain text on the wire?
You might be up to something there... It's just easier to monitor plain
text messages, be it emails or SMS or whatever. And the NSA is doing it
right now(Echelon system). I recommend "Body of Secrets" by James
Bamford, which covers all of that aspects in detail, and it's also an
interesting book on the biggest secret service on earth.
With their immense computational power (who knows how many Gigaflops
they currently got?) they could probably break and scan even today's
GPG encrypted messages with ease, but not on such a large scale. That
means if everyone used PGP, they'd be screwed :-)
MfG
Bastian Schwittay
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFB+whwqxYL8ht+qXsRAlFbAJ4pkkm3wQc2MNooorb7Z2HA0YQEcgCfcTmF
/KKleIjyDV5QGp2LIOVRFoI=
=BWSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
##################################################################
Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde.
De informatie hierin is vertrouwelijk, zodat het derden niet is
toegestaan om daarvan kennis te nemen of dit te verstrekken aan
andere derden. Indien u dit e-mail bericht ontvangt terwijl het
niet voor u bestemd is, verzoeken wij u contact op te nemen met
de afzender en de informatie te verwijderen van iedere computer.
Bij voorbaat dank.
==================================================================
The information transmitted in this e-mail is intended only for
the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains
confidential information. Any review, retransmission or other
use by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete the material from any computer. Thank you.
##################################################################
#####################################################################################
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by MailMarshal
#####################################################################################
- Previous message: miguel.dilaj_at_pharma.novartis.com: "Re:encryption algs"
- Maybe in reply to: Philip Wagenaar: "Betr.: Re: encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
