Re: Betr.: RE: encryption
From: Kevin Carlson (kevin_at_kcarlson.net)
Date: 01/27/05
- Previous message: Shawn Wall: "RE: RPC over HTTP security"
- In reply to: Philip Wagenaar: "Betr.: RE: encryption"
- Next in thread: Ghaith Nasrawi: "Re:Betr.: RE: encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:37:23 -0800 To: Philip Wagenaar <p.wagenaar@accon.nl>
There are alternatives which may be more powerful or easier for you to
implement.
For example, you can control directory access using a .htaccess file
with Apache servers. Give the password to only those who should have
access.
You can also store text content in an online database such as MySQL, and
programmatically control access via password. Pages may then be
dynamically generated and accessible via a rule-based system. (This is
perhaps your most flexible option, although it does require some
programming in a language such as PHP.)
Kevin
Philip Wagenaar wrote:
>I was also looking at gnupg.
>
>There are alot of tools for it. Also signing HTML files. I was wondering if signing HTML files is useful. And if it is, anyone have any experience with it?
>
>Also, is it possible to encrypt HTML files and make them avalible for a specified number of users. I would have a webpage on my webserver. I would encrypt it gnupg/pgp.. and I would encrypt it for a number of users?
>
>Met vriendelijke groet,
>
>(Philip) Wagenaar
>Assistent ICT Projecten & Advies
>
>AccoN Accountants & Adviseurs
>ICT Projecten & Advies
>Postbus 5090
>6802 EB Arnhem
>The Netherlands
>
>tel. +31 (0)26-3842384
>fax. +31 (0)26-3630222
>mobile: +31 (0)6-25388935
>MSN/E-mail: p.wagenaar@accon.nl
>http://www.accon.nl
>
>
>
>
>>>>"Robert Hines" <b.hines@comcast.net> 25-01-05 00:22 >>>
>>>>
>>>>
>Alas, that would be because you have to pay for it now. In the olden day,
>All the PGP features were free, but now the basic signing is free, the value
>added protection is not.
>
>Bob
>
>
>
>"Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." - Aristotle 384-322 BC
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Philip Wagenaar [mailto:pb.wagenaar@chello.nl]
>Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 5:35 PM
>To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
>Subject: encryption
>
>Hi,
>
>Up to a few years ago PGP and encryption was an hot item. But it seems it
>has stand still for a few years now. Google and PGP show up only pgp
>programs that are more then years old.
>
>How is encryption these days? What has come by since PGP?
>
>Philip Wagenaar
>http://www.wagenaar.123.nl
>
>
>----------------------------------------
>I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
>It has removed 3447 spam emails to date.
>Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
>Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
>
>
>##################################################################
>
>Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde.
>De informatie hierin is vertrouwelijk, zodat het derden niet is
>toegestaan om daarvan kennis te nemen of dit te verstrekken aan
>andere derden. Indien u dit e-mail bericht ontvangt terwijl het
>niet voor u bestemd is, verzoeken wij u contact op te nemen met
>de afzender en de informatie te verwijderen van iedere computer.
>Bij voorbaat dank.
>
>==================================================================
>
>The information transmitted in this e-mail is intended only for
>the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains
>confidential information. Any review, retransmission or other
>use by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
>prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the
>sender and delete the material from any computer. Thank you.
>
>##################################################################
>
>#####################################################################################
>This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
>by MailMarshal
>#####################################################################################
>
>
>
- Previous message: Shawn Wall: "RE: RPC over HTTP security"
- In reply to: Philip Wagenaar: "Betr.: RE: encryption"
- Next in thread: Ghaith Nasrawi: "Re:Betr.: RE: encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
