RE: IIS6 Security and other web servers
adisegna_at_siscocorp.com
Date: 01/26/05
- Previous message: Juan B: "Linux boxs authentication to Cisco secure Tacacs ACS ver 3.0"
- Maybe in reply to: Rivera Alonso, David: "IIS6 Security and other web servers"
- Next in thread: H Carvey: "Re: IIS6 Security and other web servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:36:31 -0500 To: <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
David,
This question also comes to mind. Which system/software are you familiar
with? Will you have to learn Apache or IIS? I've had a locked down IIS
6.0 server online using WEBDAV and SSL for over a year now without
issue.. Knock, Knock. Think about the Total Cost of Ownership as well...
AD
Proactive not reactive is the name of the game.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rivera Alonso, David [mailto:drivera@iberdrola.es]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 9:52 AM
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: IIS6 Security and other web servers
Dear friends,
I just want to throw a little question to know your opinion.
I was discussing yesterday with a friend about the quality of IIS6 from
a
Security point of view.
He immediately said it's a bad choice, as previous Microsoft web
servers.
I've read a few papers and I have this opinion: as it's been redesigned
from
the ground (with all the previous failures in mind), with the security
perspective, with every little service and option disabled by default,
and
so on, I told him that now, in my opinion, IIS6 is a good choice.
He loves GNU, Linux, and, logically, he thinks Apache is the king in
security.
Just because I felt curious, I went into www.securityfocus.com to check
the
latest vulnerability advisories, for Apache and IIS6. Incredible, Apache
wins, it has many more (not to talk about the many releases since
version
2.0)! In fact, I just found one alert about IIS6.
What do you experts think?
Of course, I know IIS was very dangerous before version 6.
But, maybe an IIS6 in a well configured, patched and securized Windows
2003
machine is al last a good choice to house Web Applications?
Or maybe it's too soon, there are few installed, and maybe in the future
it'll have as many holes as the predecessors?
What do you think?
best regards from Spain,
DAVID
=============================
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario.
Puede contener informacion confidencial sometida a secreto profesional o
cuya divulgacion
este prohibida, en virtud de la legislacion vigente. No esta permitida
su divulgacion,
copia o distribucion a terceros sin la autorizacion previa y por escrito
de Iberdrola.
Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos nos lo comunique
inmediatamente
por esta misma via y proceda a su destruccion.
This e-mail is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to
which it is addressed
and may contain confidential or legally privileged information, which
may not be disclosed
under current legislation. Any form of disclosure, copying or
distribution of this e-mail
is strictly prohibited, save with written authorisation from Iberdrola.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail
and delete all copies of the message.
=============================
- Previous message: Juan B: "Linux boxs authentication to Cisco secure Tacacs ACS ver 3.0"
- Maybe in reply to: Rivera Alonso, David: "IIS6 Security and other web servers"
- Next in thread: H Carvey: "Re: IIS6 Security and other web servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
