Re: Hack PGP

From: Dan Margolis (dmargoli+secbasics_at_af0.net)
Date: 01/20/05

  • Next message: Roger A. Grimes: "RE: Remote Desktop vs VPN on Windows 2003"
    Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:39:26 -0500
    To: Nazareno Vicente Feito <nvfeito@advancedsl.com.ar>
    
    

    On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:55:40PM +0000, Nazareno Vicente Feito wrote:
    > would not trust berkeley center, cause the same thing they're doing with
    > seti@home they can do with pgp keys, but anyway, paranoia aside, the thing
    > with pgp keys it's that there's a rumour (I've heard this back in 2000/2001)
    > that the M.I.T guys did have a reverse algorithm tool, quite difficult since
    > the keys are randomly generated by events on the host computer, but that
    > rumour spreaded and some people stoped trusting pgp and started thinking on
    > gpg, which is pretty similar but not the same, besides the algorithm
    > restrictions that imposes on non American Computers about the amount of bit
    > encryptions, Europe it's quite different about this regulations.

    As far as I know, the same algorithms used in GPG are available in PGP
    (DSA, RSA, and el Gamal). So the question you are presenting is; is the
    PGP implementation secure (do we trust PGP)? Granted, there may be some
    higher level of trust in GPG, since it's open source, but I haven't
    looked at it--have you?

    As for there being methods of breaking RSA (or similar), I sorta doubt
    it. For instance, in 1973, a British mathematician working for one of
    the British Military Intelligence services developed something akin to
    RSA, and the British kept it top-secret (who wouldn't want to?). But
    only 5 years later, R, S, and A came up with their own system and
    released it publicly. With all the potential fame, fortune, and glory to
    be gained from publicly breaking RSA, I find it hard to imagin that
    someone would have done so and kept it secret--and that nobody else
    would also have done so.

    Finally, regarding seti@home, there is a similar project for this very
    purpose, distributed.net. However, there's a really huge difference
    between breaking DES and breaking a standard-length RSA key.

    -- 
    Dan
    

  • Next message: Roger A. Grimes: "RE: Remote Desktop vs VPN on Windows 2003"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: QUESTION: DH/DSS or RSA for PGP Keys
      ... > is DH/DSS or RSA? ... As far as PGP goes, it doesn't really seem to matter. ... Although DH/DSS keys have better backwards compatibility, ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: QUESTION DH/DSS vs RSA key for PGP
      ... > backwards compatibility you mentioned with RSA? ... Any PGP version capable of using DH keys ... The v4 RSA keys are not really fully backward compatible with PGP versions ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: PGP Secure? Nope!
      ... PGP has had the option of using 3DES since version 5.0. ... while also retaining the option of v3 RSA ... The option of v4 RSA keys was added in PGP 7.x. ...
      (alt.computer.security)
    • Re: Fortune 50 secure e-mail
      ... "who do you trust". ... >>>that's what a X.509 certificate is saying. ... Don't use certificates then, use PGP. ... PGP keys will be created within the organization, ...
      (comp.security.misc)
    • The configuration window will display what each setting is for. In some cases
      ... current nym-servers support only RSA ... Create new PGP and Mix keys for your remailer. ...
      (sci.crypt)