Re: Simple Firewall: Summary

From: G Farnham (gfarnham_at_gmail.com)
Date: 01/09/05

  • Next message: JM: "Re: Source Port 0 Host Sweep"
    Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:55:37 -0800
    To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    
    

    Alexander,
    I think you are correct that IPSec could be used as a stateless packet
    filter to deny traffic from explicit IP addresses. I shouldn't have
    lumped it with the other ones in my summary. I didn't know you could
    use IPSec this way without running it on clients as well. After going
    through your first link, looks to me like it would work for what I
    need. I also found that there is a PG Lite version of peer guardian
    that is a stripped down version. I think the PKTFilter and PG Lite
    are the best solutions for me. They are both very simple and adding
    IP addresses to the deny list is as easy as editing a text file.
    With IPSec it took about 20 forms to do it interactively. Probably
    could do it with the command line util ipseccmd.exe one quicker.

    Thanks for the links.

    Greg

    On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:09:00 +0300, Alexander Suhovey
    <asuhovey@mtu-net.ru> wrote:
    > Regarding IPSec filters - don't know why you desided that there's no deny
    > capability. You can create a filter to block certain types of traffic
    > to/from sertain set of IP address, subnet or DNS name.
    > Here's a couple of links on topic. First is good example of GUI-based
    > configuration of IPSec filters while second talks command line.
    >
    > How can I block a Windows 2000/XP/2003 computer from surfing on the Internet
    > but still allow it to surf to Intranet sites?
    > http://www.petri.co.il/block_internet_but_allow_intranet_with_ipsec.htm
    >
    > How to block specific network protocols and ports by using IPSec:
    > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;813878
    >
    > Hth,
    > Al
    >
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: G Farnham [mailto:gfarnham@gmail.com]
    > > Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 1:27 AM
    > > To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    > > Subject: Simple Firewall: Summary
    > >
    > > Thanks for all the responses. Summary below.
    > > Followup question:
    > > Are there any good tools for testing firewall performance.
    > > Specifically in terms of latency added by firewall.
    > >
    > >
    > > Summary:
    > >
    > > 1) This looks like best solution for me
    > > Try PktFilter
    > >
    > > http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/outils/pktfilter/
    > >
    > > 2) This one looks viable also
    > > ou may be able to use peerguardian... A firewall of sorts for
    > > peer-2-peer apps that uses a deny list to prevent the
    > > FBI/RIAA/MPAA etc.
    > > from snooping your shared files. You should be able to pick
    > > that up at http://www.methlabs.org/methlabs.htm
    > >
    > > 3) recommendations for commercial firewalls would probably
    > > work, some recommended ones are:
    > > Kerio
    > > tiny firewall
    > > sygate
    > >
    > > 4) Win Remote access service RRAS
    > > I think this would work, but more overhead than I want
    > >
    > > 4) Use windows IP filtering, Win2003 SP1 (like XP SP2
    > > firewall), IPSec white list I don't think any of these meet my needs.
    > > I need a deny capability. Permit or White list will not help
    > > me as the service (game server) needs to be open to the public.
    > > As far as I know, built in IP filtering is "permit only" not
    > > deny capability.
    > > XP SP2 firewall has no way to define a deny list for source IP.
    > > [If I have any of this wrong, feel free to correct me, but
    > > please provide details on how to do it or where to see it]
    > >
    > > GDF
    > >
    >
    >


  • Next message: JM: "Re: Source Port 0 Host Sweep"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Firewall recommendation
      ... Though not really designed to be a firewall, you might look into using ipsec ... filtering which uses only permit/deny filter actions and no negotiation for ESP/AH. ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: IPSEC
      ... > IPSEC works differently than a firewall in that a firewall will allow ... > IPSEC will not allow any inbound traffic regardless of the origin, ... > in lieu of individual rules denying traffic on specific ports. ... If deny all rule is there then ALL ports except for those specifically ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: Spyware Blocklist (slightly off topic)
      ... IPsec is more in the encryption realm of things which is more an internal ... internet then it is no alternative to a firewall. ... You can filter IP ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • IPSec Vs Firewall software
      ... At the beginning I thought I could implement a firewall using IPSec provided ... w/ Win2k Server. ... Create an IP filter to filter all TCP from ANY IP to MY IP, NO mirror, ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
    • Re: IPSec Vs Firewall software
      ... I have used ipsec to work in a similar situation though I think you are better off ... You might first want to check your filter so that it is allowing inbound traffic from ... > At the beginning I thought I could implement a firewall using IPSec provided ... Create an IP filter to filter all TCP from ANY IP to MY IP, NO mirror, ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.security)

  • Quantcast