RE: Lots of incoming traffic on UDP 1026 and UDP 1027?

From: Paul Duffany (paul.duffany_at_sanmina-sci.com)
Date: 12/29/04

  • Next message: G Farnham: "Simple Firewall"
    To: <webmaster@focushacks.com>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
    Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:09:37 -0800
    
    

    Directory hacks against a mail server?

    Paul Duffany
    Network Engineer
    Sanmina-SCI Corporation
    desk: 408-904-2428
    cell: 408-234-0958

    John 3:16
    1st Corinthians 13

    ********************************* Notice
    *****************************************************
    This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential or privileged
    information.
    If you believe you have received the message in error, please notify the
    sender by
    reply transmission and delete the message without copying or disclosing it.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: FocusHacks [mailto:focushacks@gmail.com]
    Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:35 AM
    To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    Subject: Lots of incoming traffic on UDP 1026 and UDP 1027?

    I searched the archives at SecurityFocus and couldn't come up with
    anything useful other than someone with Zone Alarm obviously saw the
    same activity and people were trying to tell him to look for listening
    ports on his machine, which is not the case.
    I'm getting literally hammered by tons of various IP's on UDP 1026 and UDP
    1027
    I've attached a CSV log, modified a bit, from my NetScreen 5. I only
    showed the last 15 bytes of the Source IP:Port so the first octet,
    give or take a few bytes, is cut off. I left a few columns out as
    well.
    Let me know, this has been going on for quite a while, and all my
    searches are ending in vain. Any ideas?

    --
    http://www.FocusHacks.com - The Ford Focus Modification Site!
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    _
    Scanned by Sanmina-SCI eShield
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    _
    

  • Next message: G Farnham: "Simple Firewall"