RE: Roaming Firewall Solution Information

From: G.Crow (secure.computing_at_gmail.com)
Date: 12/11/04

  • Next message: Corey Watts-Jones: "RE: Windows private folder option decryption"
    To: <security-basics@lists.securityfocus.com>
    Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:35:31 -0500
    
    

    The VPN client is set up like that when they use it - I'm more concerned
    with their use of the computer when not using VPN.

    SP2, sadly, breaks something on our laptop images, and I haven't had the
    time to fix it yet. I'm going to be taking care of that in my next =
    batch,
    actually, but I haven't worked with the built-in firewall too much, =
    since I
    operate my desktops in a trusted environment.

    It would be quite easy to push and maintain something like that out once
    they are at SP2, though. Unfortunately, this doesn't take care of my =
    Win2k
    laptops, of which there are a few. Any ideas?

    Gabe

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Max Pettersson [mailto:macks53@msn.com]
    > Sent: December 10, 2004 3:42 PM
    > To: secure.computing@gmail.com
    > Subject: RE: Roaming Firewall Solution Information
    >=20
    > Hello!
    >=20
    > Is it possible to configure the clients to avoid using split-tunnels,
    > connecting the computer to both the internet directly and your =
    vpn-tunnel.
    > By limiting only internet access trought the vpn tunnel you should be =
    able
    > to control traffic trough your main vpn-concentrator and firewall. =
    Then
    > simple use the very good builting firewall that ships with SP2. =
    That=B4s the
    > simplest solution im my opinion.
    >=20
    > //Max
    >=20
    > >From: "G.Crow" <secure.computing@gmail.com>
    > >Reply-To: "G.Crow" <secure.computing@gmail.com>
    > >To: security-basics@lists.securityfocus.com
    > >Subject: Roaming Firewall Solution Information
    > >Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 20:16:12 -0500
    > >
    > >Greetings,
    > >
    > >
    > >I'm seeking a firewall solution that I can deploy on my mobile users
    > >laptops. I've done some research into this, but in my position I've
    > >been extremely pressed for time lately, and don't know if I can get
    > >the research done in the near future, especially since quotes for the
    > >products I'm familiar with are hard to come by for business users.
    > >Any experiences, help, or recommendations into this are more than
    > >welcome.
    > >
    > >
    > >Basically I'm tired of worrying if my users are going to bring home
    > >the next big thing. I know what I'd pick for myself, but I'm not so
    > >sure what is so good for end users - I'm looking for something I can
    > >set up a base template of rules for and leave running without forcing
    > >my users to make 'hard' choices in the field - and therefore call me.
    > >I'm not currently looking at one of the centrally managed firewall
    > >solutions, primarily for cost reasons - I'm doing this outside of the
    > >central IT budget for a subset of users specific to my facility. I
    > >haven't seen any particular studies on this issue, and testing all =
    the
    > >various products out there isn't in my immediate time scope.
    > >
    > >
    > >My criteria/situation is as follows:
    > >
    > >
    > >-Environment: Mixed Win2k SP4/WinXP SP1 laptops. Varied hardware.
    > >~20-30 or so.
    > >-Budget: $50 a head or so, lower preferable, but variance is =
    allowed.
    > >-Desired features: Importable rulesets, local logging, user-friendly
    > >(as they *will* end up making it ask about some traffic)
    > > -Compatibility: Cisco VPN Client, Novell, Internal web apps, i.e.
    > >nothing too extreme except for possibly the Cisco client -Timeframe:
    > >Trying to get this purchased before 2005
    > >
    > > I've looked into ZoneAlarm and Checkpoint Integrity, but Zone Labs =
    is
    > >elusive in which product they will license to business customers, and
    > >at what price, so I'm unsure even of what product to test. =
    Checkpoint
    > >seems a little pricey for the simplified solution I'm going for -
    > >however unlike ZoneAlarm and Tiny, I haven't played with it to be
    > >sure. My experience with Tiny has been anything but user-friendly, a
    > >key concern. I also haven't used recent versions, so I don't know if
    > >it's improved. Kerio I haven't used, and I'm unsure of other
    > >client-based unmanaged firewalls to check out.
    > >
    > >
    > >Thank you for any help you can provide,
    > >
    > >Gabe
    > >secure dot computing at gmail d0t com
    >=20
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > L=E4ttare att hitta dr=F6mresan med MSN Resor http://www.msn.se/resor/


  • Next message: Corey Watts-Jones: "RE: Windows private folder option decryption"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Do VPN connections effectively bypass Firewalls?
      ... You need to use a host based firewall installed on the VPN client machine. ... > Destination port: 80 ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: Do VPN connections effectively bypass Firewalls?
      ... You need to use a host based firewall installed on the VPN client machine. ... > Destination port: 80 ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: MS VPN & Firewall problem
      ... I have 2 connection the local on which I have my ... internet connection and the VPN client one. ... Firewall can be enabled on the VPN connection and there is no problem. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Re: Firewall Blocking when off
      ... VPN connections can be complex and require network tracing and viewing the ... logs on the VPN server. ... The Windows Firewall should not be blocking any ... Once SP2 is loaded, I have the problem, even with the ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Re: *** HELP: Windows XP VPN Client behind firewall
      ... firewall blocks this protocol. ... > The network behind the firewall is also public IPs ... > Windows XP/2000 VPN Client on the network behind firewall trying to ... > What the incoming port should be opened for establishing the VPN Client ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.ras_routing)