RE: DOS Attack?

From: David Gillett (gillettdavid_at_fhda.edu)
Date: 11/29/04

  • Next message: Ramsey Consulting Services: "Re: Windows Messenger Pop-up spam"
    To: "'Shawn Wall'" <sjwall@shaw.ca>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
    Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:28:13 -0800
    
    

    1. If you have "established" in your ACL, it will allow in any TCP
    packet that doesn't just have the SYN flag set. I've seen nasty
    traffic send only RST packets to get the traffic past an ACL...

    2. DoS attacks often rely on resource starvation, and the easiest
    resource to consume is bandwidth. If I were to send you more traffic
    than your pipe could carry, packets would have to be lost -- even if
    you were dropping all of my traffic when it reached your ACL. And
    if packets are being dropped at the upstream end of your pipe, there
    can be good odds that legitimate connections originating from your
    network never receive their answers....

    David Gillett

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Shawn Wall [mailto:sjwall@shaw.ca]
    > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 6:23 PM
    > To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    > Subject: DOS Attack?
    >
    >
    > Hi List,
    >
    > I'm currently experiencing network outages due to what
    > appears to be DOS
    > attacks. I'm running a wireless ISP using a Cisco 2611 and
    > CBAC and I have a
    > /24 public address range. During the outage I can see traffic
    > from a single
    > external host sending thousands of packets to a single
    > internal host. I
    > don't have port 80 inbound open in my ACLs so I don't
    > understand how the
    > external host is even able to contact the internal host to begin with.
    > Secondly, how is it possible for an attack on 1 internal host
    > to cripple the
    > rest of my network? Any feedback would be welcome. Thanks.
    >
    > shawn
    >
    >


  • Next message: Ramsey Consulting Services: "Re: Windows Messenger Pop-up spam"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: [fw-wiz] Odd PIX / router behavior
      ... When you saw the original spoofed traffic, what kind of packets were ... My first thought was a misconfigured internal host too, ... 10.0.0.1 is the inside interface of the PIX. ...
      (Firewall-Wizards)
    • Re: TCP 3 Way Handshake
      ... You need to check the actual packets ... old fragmentation problem for another client. ... A "deny tcp src dst established" ACL ... no logg con! ...
      (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
    • Re: netfilter - do you DROP or REJECT?
      ... If connections are REJECTed the port is reported ... My rule for this situation is DROP all packets you want to block from the ... common login usernames/passwords). ... servers against several DOS attacks & login dictionary attacks. ...
      (comp.os.linux.security)
    • Re: MAC attacks?
      ... TCP, then the DoS attacker has to spoof TCP packets. ... these DoS attacks are not ... IPSEC silently drops packets with invalid MACs. ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: CBWFQ Cisco 2600s
      ... ACLS for stuff like permitting outside terminal server sessions, ... In this case I am using the ACL to match a range. ... routing processor avoiding any queing. ... QoS affects the order that packets are transmitted on the output ...
      (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)