Re: 0.0.0.0 Probes
From: Miles Stevenson (miles_at_mstevenson.org)
Date: 10/22/04
- Previous message: David Gillett: "RE: 0.0.0.0 Probes"
- In reply to: David Gillett: "RE: 0.0.0.0 Probes"
- Next in thread: Keith Bucknall: "RE: 0.0.0.0 Probes"
- Reply: Keith Bucknall: "RE: 0.0.0.0 Probes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com, gillettdavid@fhda.edu Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:02:05 -0400
David,
<snip>
> These packets are not *to* 0.0.0.0; they just claim to be
> *from* there. Unless a router is specifically configured to
> check the source address for validity, it won't care. (The
> RFC passage you quote prevents attempts to *reply* to such
> packets from saturating the whole Internet.)
</snip>
Agreed. Thank you for the correction.
>"..SHOULD NOT originate datagrams addressed to 0.0.0.0".
Use of the words "originate" and "to" in the same phrase to represent traffic
flow seems, at first glance, to be in conflict with each other, and is likely
the source of my misinterpretation.
Another example of the importance of semantics when then intention is to
communicate accurately.
-- Miles Stevenson miles@mstevenson.org PGP FP: 035F 7D40 44A9 28FA 7453 BDF4 329F 889D 767D 2F63
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: David Gillett: "RE: 0.0.0.0 Probes"
- In reply to: David Gillett: "RE: 0.0.0.0 Probes"
- Next in thread: Keith Bucknall: "RE: 0.0.0.0 Probes"
- Reply: Keith Bucknall: "RE: 0.0.0.0 Probes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|