Re: Intro To Hacking
From: Barrie Dempster (barrie_at_reboot-robot.net)
Date: 10/19/04
- Previous message: Dubber, Drew B: "RE: Account Lockout"
- In reply to: Greg Tracy: "Re: Intro To Hacking"
- Next in thread: Jon Lawhead: "Re: Intro To Hacking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:55:54 +0100
There have been a few concerns on this thread about the placement of a
development/insecure staging box on a production LAN.
I usually suggest that people intending to do development use a virtual
server environment that allows creation of virtual LANs, this way you
can keep the development box off your main network and still play with
it.
I personally use MS virtual Server 2005[1], solely because it's cheaper
for me than the offerings by vmware[2] but it does the job extremely
well. (I also don't yet know of any OSS alternative for this that
provides the same features). I'd suggest either MS Virtual Server or one
of the vmware systems (>workstation). I believe you can trial each of
the systems listed to see if they fit your needs. Having the ability to
build and run lots of OS's and networks on one machine makes
testing/playing a breeze as it saves you having a pile of hardware
running or unnecessary un-patched systems in your production
environment.
[1]http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/default.mspx
[2]http://www.vmware.com/products/
Kind Regards to all.
-- Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue http://www.bsrf.org.uk [ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x96025FD0 ]
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Dubber, Drew B: "RE: Account Lockout"
- In reply to: Greg Tracy: "Re: Intro To Hacking"
- Next in thread: Jon Lawhead: "Re: Intro To Hacking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
